-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Bible reviewer reviews the Trump bible.
- Thread starter EconGuy
- Start date
Just what the world needs.
Or, for that matter, dumb and deity.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
The review is actually quite good if you start where the OP has the video begin. It seems to be a rather long TLDR of what he says earlier. If you did not watch it spoiler alert, he did not like it either for various reasons. He did not think, as a Christian, that it was an appropriate Bible for Christians. He made a rational and not an emotional judgement against it from a Christian perspective. I am not a Christian any longer, but I can admire one that follows the basics of his faith and comes up with a rational conclusion.
Sir Joseph
Member
Excellent review of a new Bible version I'd not seen. I agree with Tim's negative conclusions.
I'm a Trump supporting, patriotic, American Christian who does not accept the misguided notion of separation of church and state. Yet, I think the Holy Bible is too sacred to be adding nationalistic material at the expense of ommitting other appropriate, traditional material - like scriptural notes, references, maps, etc.
I'm glad to see Trump openly supporting the Christian faith as he's done in many ways, but I think his endorsement for the Bible in general would have been better (and more appropriate) than singling out this subpar version.
I'm a Trump supporting, patriotic, American Christian who does not accept the misguided notion of separation of church and state. Yet, I think the Holy Bible is too sacred to be adding nationalistic material at the expense of ommitting other appropriate, traditional material - like scriptural notes, references, maps, etc.
I'm glad to see Trump openly supporting the Christian faith as he's done in many ways, but I think his endorsement for the Bible in general would have been better (and more appropriate) than singling out this subpar version.