ChieftheCef
Active Member
Sorry for jumping in on that one, but I have to answer it myself too. To some degree for my own sanity.
The truth is... to me, personally, I can't say either way. It's somehow both. Consciousness is somehow a fundamental potential in the universe, if not realized, it at least have to exist as a possibility, just as the potential for stars existed in the singularity before big bang (this I've heard from scientists, not my idea at all). But at the same time, consciousness do arise from the interaction of particles, cells in the brain. And the really curious thing is that somehow, consciousness arises from the information processing rather than the particles, cells, chemicals, etc themselves. It's not a "mind cell" that gives us a mind. It's not a "consciousness atom" that gives us consciousness. It's something that is realized in the holistic interaction, not the single sub-processes. It's a swarm emergent property, which is actually a bit mysterious. A bunch of cells sending signals to each other, and... we're aware.
What about consciousness being fundamental to spacetime and matter and/or energy sort of picking up that signal and filtering through it's own biological mechanisms?Do you see consciousness as a fundamental property or as an emergent property of physical interactions?
Spacetime is a good candidate for god as it has many of the featured attributes of god and is a solution to the great chain of everything (what came before the first cause? Nothingness, spacetime). Besides this nothing, spacetime, is said to have created universes, everything.