It's almost like you dont really read. You just look at the things you want to "fit in" with your believes. But anyhow......
Jehovah's Witnesses are in denial of this matter perhaps even more intensely than most people are. And this is clearly evidenced by how they add their own thoughts to the translation of the text. So I will use their Bibles and their references to show you where they err.
We must capture the whole thought as trying to develop an understanding from pieces of the thought in isolation is a dangerous practice. The thought begins at 1 John 3:3 and continues to at least 1 John 3:10.
We must make certain we keep all of the thoughts complimentary as expressed in verses 3-10. We will do that by asking questions. For example: Is John telling us that it is not a big thing that we sin just once in a great while? If he where telling us that then he would also have to be saying that it is not such a big thing if we once in a great while we don't love our brother, as spoken of in verse 10 and from there forward. If our thoughts are to be consistent, they must stay consistent throughout the entire thought.
<><><><>
Note carefully that the thought begins in verse 3 with the person purifying their own self, not with allowance for sin, but “just as that one is pure”:
1 John 3: 3 “And everyone who has this hope in him purifies himself, (2Co 7:1) just as that one is pure.” {2013 NWT}
Now think about that carefully; As the thought is about purifying our self, which means growing progressively cleaner, John cannot be telling us that we are OK so long as we don't make a practice of sinning. Rather, he must be telling us that we must be committed to the elimination of sin out of our life. Otherwise it makes a joke out of the thought of purifying ourselves, “just as that one is pure.” One bathes their self to become clean, not partly clean. And “just as that one is pure” leaves no allowance for sin. Any sin is like the sow returning to roll in it's mire, matter not in how small a way. It is yet not being pure “just as that one is pure.” 2Co 7:1 is only applicable to immature babes like those John began speaking to in chapter 1, saying to them, “that you too may have fellowship [Or “a sharing.”] with us.”
<><><><>
Your organizations tend to make it about the mere practice of sin, yet knowing that even one sin violates the entire law. James 2:10 “For if anyone obeys all the Law but makes a false step in one point, he has become an offender against all of it.”
Do you not see that you are stumbling babes who believe you and so think to themselves that the issue is just to do the best you can? That is not the issue! The issue is that you must be holy because he is holy.:
1st Peter 1: 14-16
14 “As obedient children, stop being molded by the desires you formerly had in your ignorance,
15 but like the Holy One who called you, become holy yourselves in all your conduct,
16 for it is written: “You must be holy, because I am holy.”
Do you imagine John spoke against that?
Notice in verse 4 how the NWT steps away from the singularity of that thought John expressed in verse 3, to purify ourselves “just as that one is pure”:
1 John 3: 4 “Everyone who practices sin is also practicing lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.” {2013 NWT}
The very next verse, verse 5, relates this comment in verse 4 back to Jesus. Are you claiming Jesus simply did not make it a practice to sin?
1 John 3: 5 “You know, too, that he was made manifest to take away our sins, (Le 16:21, 22; Isa 53:11; Joh 1:29) and there is no sin in him.” {2013 NWT}
It is appalling what the NWT is doing, adding textual references to make themselves appear credible while violating the heart of the thought of the context through their ill choice of words, like, “practice.”
This venue Jehovah's Witnesses are proffering, claiming that we can have union with him so long as we don't make it a practice to sin, totally violates the thought of our need to purify ourselves as he is pure, meaning reaching that point of maturity where we no longer sin just as there is no sin in him.
Worse, even if they do not intend for it to do so, the way they have worded it misleads people to take it easy on themselves, blinding them from what John was really telling them.
Now all things are being brought back to God in Christ, but not you if you yet sin, for there is no sin in him and neither can there be. Is a blemished sacrifice holy? Read: Hebrews 12:14; Romans 12:1; 1st Peter 1: 14-16; and 1st John 2:28-29
<><><><>
Just look at how the way the NWT has worded verses 6 and 7 throws them into conflict with each other:
1 John 3: 6-7 “Everyone remaining in union with him does not practice sin; (Ro 6:12) no one who practices sin has either seen him or come to know him. Little children, let no one mislead you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as that one is righteous.” {2013 NWT}
Are they saying that Jesus merely didn't practice sin? The babe reads it as saying that he or she is OK so long as they have not made it a practice to sin. Where has the thought of being holy as he is holy gone in that idea?
<><><><>
Look at verse 8. Are they out of their minds, presenting it as though it is only the practice of sin that is from the devil? If not for the devil there would be no sin. Any sin is of the devil. And you cannot take of the table of Jehovah and the table of the devil, too, matter not what quantities you pick and choose to do it in. Even on sin is like sacrificing Christ afresh. One violation of the law breaks the entire law. And that must be kept in focus lest we lull many to sleep under a false pretense of believing they are secure so long as they have not a pattern of practicing sin.
1 John 3: 8 “The one who practices sin originates with the Devil, because the Devil has been sinning from the beginning [Or “from when he began.”]. (Ge 3:14; Joh 8:44) For this purpose the Son of God was made manifest, to break up [Or “destroy.”] the works of the Devil. (Joh 16:33; Heb 2:14)” {2013 NWT}
What is literally said there? “The [one] doing the sin<[singular number, accusative case, feminine gender] out of the devil he is, because from beginning the devil is sinning. Into this was manifested the Son of God in order that he might loose the works of the devil.”
You said I read into the scriptures? Do you see the word practice anywhere in that? Nor will you in the rest of those verses. But this idea that we are OK so long as we do not practice sin is an ear tickling idea. It speaks to what many would rather hear. And whether or not that is what Jehovah's Witnesses intended, that is how the affect their wording of this text has.
<><><><>
Notice that though the word practice is not here wither as regards to practicing righteousness,
1 John 3: 9 “Everyone who has been born from God does not practice sin, (1Jo 5:18) for His seed [That is, seed capable of reproducing, or bearing fruit] remains in such one, and he cannot practice sin, for he has been born from God. (1Pe 1:23)” {2013 NWT}
Now, their footnote as I showed there, “[That is, seed capable of reproducing, or bearing fruit]”, is correct. I have long seen that is the same seed as sown to man's hearts in Matthew 13:19 and 1st Corinthians 3:6.
But we run into a dilemma if we think that allows for us to continue to have occasional sins with no manifest progress toward that being holy as he is holy. See: 2 Timothy 2:4-5; and:
Romans 12: 1-2, 9
1 “Therefore, I appeal to you by the compassions of God, brothers, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, a sacred service with your power of reason.
2 And stop being molded by this system of things, but be transformed by making your mind over, l so that you may prove to yourselves m the good and acceptable and perfect will of God. ….......
…...... 9 Let your love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is wicked; cling to what is good.”
<><><><>
1 John 3: 10 “The children of God and the children of the Devil are evident by this fact: Whoever does not practice righteousness does not originate with God, nor does the one who does not love his brother. (1Jo 4:8)” {2013 NWT}
Revelation 3:16 “So because you are lukewarm and neither hot nor cold, I am going to vomit you out of my mouth.”
Is there really any room for even a singular sin? Is not every single sin we commit like an open door to the devil? How many sins by Adam and Eve did it require to get this world trapped into the devil and his ways?