I am talking what the articles teach and they were clearly telling that if a woman does not scream or put up enough resistance then she has committed fornication.
I think there is a different between one elder and watch is taought in the WT
I have been asking myself this very question, I...
And if someone decided to leave at the time because they didn't agree that rape is sometimes fornication, they have left God. So if people leave because the WT is wrong about something is that not the WT fault? And I am not talking about minors things, rape is not a minor issue. How do you think...
I do have ill feeling if what is being taught is wrong, yes even if it is in the past think of all the people who it effected for decades at the time it was being taught. I wonder if the governing body apologises for these things?
It is not only the WT past that gets brought up.
I critise WT...
The point was about disrespecting Gods name, read back.
And you used to teach it, so at that time it was considered truth and spiritual food. The idea that rape could be fornication was taught up to 1989.
No one allows someone to rape them that why it is rape, but people handle the situation differently out of fear, and a woman should not be comdemned because she didn't do everything to resist.