• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. R

    Evidence

    Someone is a little optimistic. The theist 'debaters' have yet to present any information to back up their claims. Hence the lack of responses, why respond when all the opposing side is doing is making claims with no support. Personally, I stopped after waisting my time reading the article...
  2. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I understand what the thread is about, and my point it that this thread is useless. For two un-ignorable reasons. Number one, there is no evidence for a God. Number two, there is no concrete definition for a God. Without both of those there is not reason to compare gravity to God. That is...
  3. R

    Is the Concept of God Necessary To Explain Anything?

    God's punishment is cruel an unusual, a person going to hell just because they were born of a family that believes in a incorrect religion. Or how about the serial murderer who goes to heaven because he asked for forgiveness from god. As it says in the bible all sins can be forgiven. In the...
  4. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Man I can not believe I never thought of that, I am so much stupider then you! I have an idea, lets use your exact same logic. I ask you this? Prove that God does not not exist? Aww, now look who is frustrated. :yes:
  5. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Blatant ignorance, note to others: he is not worth responding to, considering he can not grasp the simple concept that without evidence there is not need to consider it in an equation. This is the same baseless argument theists continue to make in their desperate attempts to defend their...
  6. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I see where I got confused. First I did add an edit to the post to make it more clear. There is no difference between the validity of beliefs of someone who believes in god and someone who kills in the name of god, they are both adamant about their beliefs and are convinced that their personal...
  7. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    You should really go back and read the conversation.
  8. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    What are you talking about? It is completely relevant. The fact that you think you are an exception is the exact point we are trying to make. You should be suspect of what you believe, because research shows how erroneous your mind is.
  9. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I am confused, maybe the way i presented an idea was interpreted by you in a way I did not expect. Do you mind elaborating on what you are thinking.
  10. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I guess I am a little more optimistic then that. I fail to see logic in this, you are stating that it is wrong to say there is no evidence when there might be evidence. Most of your posts tend to be solid but I am having a hard time seeing what you are trying to get at. My (subjective)...
  11. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I think a better question would be, What is the difference, then, between you killing and the person who finds it logical to kill in the name of god? In this case the action is the same but the reason is not. For if I kill I take responsibility, where as the person killing in the name of god...
  12. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I point you to this, thread.
  13. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Again you are incorrect, there is no evidence that is irrefutable, hence the need for the scientific method. What I did say was that there is vast evidence for the erroneous nature of the human mind, and there is no evidence for divine experiences. So when someone claims to have divine...
  14. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I have to agree, belittling only hurts his position. To put it simply if someone is not convinced by what you are saying then you are not saying it the best way it could be said.
  15. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Adamant in that until evidence comes arrogant to change my mine, I stick to logic. The reworded version ( see previous post) is justifiable, there is no more evidence for one stance, so yes they are the same and that is why it is justifiable.
  16. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Note: I never called you moronic I called your question moronic, it is you who came to the conclusion that a single moronic act makes you a moron, which by the way is not correct. Also I would like to add that you are correct in calling me on this statement, I should have worded it as such...
  17. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I have no idea why I keep responding to you, but I tell you again go back and read what was posted, you will see. This is simply incorrect, there is vast verifiable evidence for the erroneous nature of the human mind. Incorrect it is moronic, anyway you look at it a 'challenge' (as you word...
  18. R

    Evidence

    You should read it again, there is a big difference between subjectivity and intersubjectively verifiable.
  19. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    I think you mean less important but in either case they are not part of a different world they live by the same information we all come across. Yet for some reason because they believe is the socially accepting God it is ok to act without thinking. There is no difference between someone who...
  20. R

    An appeal for the logic of religious belief

    Go back and read the series of posts we were not talking about god we were talking about 'divine experiences'. I have verifiable evidence for erroneous nature of the human mind. Where there is no verifiable evidence for divine experiences. And by the way, it is moronic to ask someone to prove...
Top