"So it's just a word game."
No it the difference between factual and verified science and non factual religiosity and theories of evolution.
"But I don't call it "Intelligent Design" because that would be misleading."
Probably would be in your case but like I said it does not require a God or...
How about you go start your won discussion instead of hijacking mine.
Or is it OK if we do the same to any Evolutionist posts to stop all discussion so this forum is meaningless?
Try a little maturity please!
I define it the way it is used every day in science. Are you claiming we do not use Intelligent Design in the creation of organisms?
It is evolutionists that have tried to lump ID in with creationism so they can avoid the fact that Evolution is just one way life could have formed on earth...
I added that after I seen it:
I am on the side of science and ID is science. Evolution is many theories that has many holes and does not address the origin of life.
Together they might explain how life came to form on this planet or on other planets we may visit in the future.
No you are hijacking the discussion.
If you don't like the topic go start your own discussion.
I am on the side of science and ID is science. Evolution is many theories that has many holes and does not address the origin of life.
Together they might explain how life came to form on this...
This is a discussion for evolution and intelligent design.
If you can't stay on topic and want to discuss food go start your own discussion instead of hijacking mine.
This is a discussion for evolution and intelligent design.
If you can't stay on topic and want to discuss food go start your own discussion instead of hijacking mine.
This is a discussion for evolution and intelligent design.
If you can't stay on topic and want to discuss food go start your own discussion instead of hijacking mine.
It is not a semantic argument and evolutuonists have tried to lump ID into creationism so they can avoid the fact that evolution is not the only way life can be started on a new world.
This opens up the discussion so we can start looking at other methods planets can be made livable and form...
The title is a follow up on my other discussion about Intelligent design and why it is not creationism and required no God or Super Natural power.
There were many in those discussions that were still associating creationism with intelligent design to dismiss the idea so this is their chance to...
Thought that might get your attention so before you rush to post your arguments read:
We have been designing organism for a long time through cross breeding and inbreeding species like dogs, horses, cats and any domesticated animals. It is is intelligent design not natural selection and is...
Sure they are!
We clone and create genetically modified organism all the time through intelligent design.
Has nothing to do with creating the universe we live in.
" there is nothing in our DNA that did not get there (or that was not preserved there) by an evolutionary mechanism"
OK let's assume you are correct. Then by that logic we would have many many millions of evolutions in our genetic history that would be response related (goosebumps etc.) stored...
OK but intelligent Design generally refers to how life came to be on this planet and not necessarily how the universe formed.
You can take it to that extent but then you are wandering into creationism which is not the same as Intelligent Design.