This is what Chat GPT has to say,
The 14th Dynasty of ancient Egypt is a relatively obscure and poorly understood period in Egyptian history, primarily due to the limited archaeological evidence and fragmentary records that have survived. Here's what we know:
1. Who were the 14th Dynasty?
The...
Scientists are engaged in deciphering that which was handed down to a bunch of marginally literate people a few thousand years ago, sorry but as you should know from all the things you don't understand, we have had to figure it out on our own. We have figured out that bugs are bugs, but give...
Yes we have heard that, but what does all the assumptions and experiments mean if to you it means people make sense? How does that relate to the rest of us.
And what does that mean to the rest of us 8 billion. Is this a personal variation on nihilism where nothing means anything or anything means everything?
Of what use is this assumption and how does one use it in regards to others?
So in other words, which won't mean the same to you as they do to the other 8 billion -1, you are somehow granted an ability that no-one else has and furthermore we will never be able to understand it because we cannot do the appropriate experiments in our heads and thus rely on what we see...
It is still in my stack so here it is again.
I could believe as you do that there is some sort of instantaneous/sudden change in all things, but this experiment would cause me to question my belief, not insist as you do that it didn't really happen.
You are more than welcome to demonstrate...
Your inability to understand the words you use is not our problem.
But I would be curious as to how and why you dismiss this fairly simple experiment in contradiction to your assertion.
Sequencing has also been done to show the individual changes as well as other follow ups.
Maybe beacause metaphysics has been discarded as a source of useful knowledge, your disagreement not withstanding.
With good reason as it appears to be only the rantings of an old man at the clouds.
Yes that is the generally accepted version of formal logic (not science), the problem here is that you do all of this in your head without external reference. secondarily, you seem to have no mechanism to deal with conditions where your conclusions do not comport with observations.
You seem to...
@YoursTrue seems to be rather new to understanding the breadth of the English language and the variety of religious expression and knowledge.
I could answer her other question reasonably as:
: a person who believes in Jesus Christ and follows his teachings.
Pretty much everything else involved...
You realize your post is just projection by the person who has some "belief in such transcendental matters" You have no evidence for your claims and are reduced to denying the obvious facts of ancestry. To your claim of no relationship, the evidence is of the same quality that is used in...
On the contrary, anomalies are what science lives for because that is where the fun begins. You have to figure out whether you made a mistake in measurement in which case you need to figure out why your system is giving poor results. (faster than light neutrinos turned out to be a loose cable)...
Not in the case of the paraphyletic clade of fishes in the Evo 101 illustration which does not include the Sarcopterygii. (the yellow band). By that classification, we are not fishes and because we cannot change our ancestry regardless of future evolution we will never be. This is a matter of...