Space would not permit a full listing here.
Of concern is your extraordinary claim--demanding extraordinary evidence--that thousands of interpreters interpreted hundreds of prophecies all wrongly, all with the same bias--the more so since faith says Jesus is Lord WITHOUT needing some or many of...
I would respond He fulfilled all the prophecies that are clearly about His life, death and resurrection, and prophecies about the church age, but none of the prophecies about His glorious Return and Armageddon, which is precisely HOW these things should work!
Thank you for the detailed response but IMHO you have a false analogy. We know for a fact how languages and words and etymology can evolve. We have numerous problems with evolution where we have mostly deadly mutations, loss of information and not new information added, etc.
It's further a...
Marvelous! Whom did Hezekiah counsel? Who called him eternal father? How did he fight several wars while being Prince of Peace?
What you've "said often" is not fact-based.
Yes, certainly. My own name means "gift of God" in Hebrew.
However, we'd now have a random doxology in Isaiah, without context. A child is born and he shall be called but Hezekiah WAS NOT called those things that we know of!
My comment was to a writer who sagely responded how it takes some stubborn willfulness to cling to the outdated abiogenesis theory. Don't worry, just as Pasteur demonstrated against nonsense, as biology uncovers increasing layers of cell complexity, abiogenesis claims will sound even more extreme.
Relationships demonstrate similarities without interposing imaginary brances for phylogenetic trees. Without DNA in fossils, all branches of the phy trees are conjectural, as you know, one reason why tree theory is in constant flux.
What might be a good way to demonstrate how people cling to myths, including abiogenesis?
Abiogenesis is a group of hypotheses, yes, for example, it's all the rage now to claim we'd need merely one replicating RNA to help jumpstart life.
Name a replicating RNA, please.
You are talking a lot of nonsense about the Bible--and I know I know the Bible far, far better than you would--you would need decades to catch up to my knowledge.
My claim is simply that Creation and Abiogenesis are neither observed in nature nor duplicable in a lab. Claiming otherwise would be...
At this point, abiogenesis should be regarded as a faith-based claim, since it is a hypothesis neither observed in nature nor duplicable in a lab.
I dislike your saying ALL creationists lie. That is not only a logical fallacy--after all, are you claiming ZERO creationists deconverted to atheism...
I do understand an ad populum. What I am working to resolve with you is different:
1) Ha Shem said Messiah will be known as Prince of Peace
2) Billions know Yeshua as Prince of Peace
Would it be easier for you if I posted 300-400 prophecies here of Jesus from Tanakh? That's the level we're...
What is "better" over that century? What has abiogenesis research yielded? That imaginary prebiotic life or imaginary self-replicating RNA made all. :(
Spontaneous generation was based on observation and assumption, changed via the advent of microscopes and a closer, more informed look.
Abiogenesis flies in the face of modern biology, which has found the simplest life to obey rules of chirality, complexity, order and DESIGN.