"In the name of" and "In accordance with" can be two completely different things. For example, the Vietnam War era chant, "Kill a commie for Chist" may have been catchy, but I'm sure the mythical charcater named Jesus would have been horrified to hear it.
That's what all media and world leaders would say. In fact, do say.
I've been reading Islam's founding document for over two decades, and my opinion is that they fit into category 1.
That's not what 'extreme' means in the contest of my question. You're comaring religions by saying that, whereas I'm questioning whether the label of 'extremist' can be pinned on a person for doing nothing more than following his religion's tenets to the letter, or if he must go beyond that...
What if it does? What if a religion explicitly says to fight others to the extent that followers know it, and don't have to think it? To me that would be an extremist. A person who 'reads in' such commands has stepped outside of his religion's tenets and as such should be...
If it's not a word, it should be.
If the vast majority of believers of whateverism practice their creed with very strict adherence to every single tenet and command (assuming whateverism has them), then they would be both mainstream and extreme.
That wasn't a response to my question.
Let me edit it to make it more clear:
Most of those who disagreed with me seemed to say that an extremist is someone who hurts people in the name of their religion. Do you concur with my assessment that the people who are disagreeing with me are claiming...
Most of those (I haven't had time to read them all) seemed to say that an extremist is someone who hurts people in the name of their religion. Do you agree with that assessment?
i've been too busy with my real life to read much of this so far. Today will be no different. Those patio stones will not move themselves.
However, from what I have read so far, it seems most responders have taken the word 'extremist' in its negative denotation of being one who inflicts harm. I...
All of that could be contained within a given religion. If a person believes all that and tries to live it, then you're describing option 1.
Which could be written "An extremist A religion has espouses an extreme view that defies basic, accepted norms of society."
It appears you have chosen the second option.
Advocating action fits regardless of which option is chosen.
How about 'strict adherent'?
Again the word 'interpret' implies you favor option 2.
Agree.