This is false, and a repeated pattern of creating a strawman, since
The Bible does inform the reader of the universe - the only one we know of today.
For the umpteenth time, the Bible is not a science text book. So, it is ridiculous to the highest level of absurdity to constantly refer to...
Likewise.
I responded to the whole post.
In fact, if you think I need to do more, then you had better go back and respond to all the posts (in this thread only) you did not respond to.
I know you can read. I hope you aren't having any problems with seeing the posts. Posts #94, and #95.
What assumptions? You didn't take your time reading, did you.
Form; create; Yes they do.
When one does not take time to read, they write things like this.
Several verses say that.
it shall not be shaken / made to totter.
mot מוֹט - to totter, shake, slip
It's not referring to movement of earth, but rather refers to it being fixed forever - its durability.
This can be seen when you read the context.
(1 Chronicles 16:30) . . .The earth is firmly...
Why would the cosmological model describe the singularity as being “God”, “Creator” or “Designer“? It's science... which doesn't do God, Ceator, Designer.
Neither does the Bible describe the singularity as being “God”, “Creator” or “Designer“. It's not a science book, and certainly isn't forming...
I do appropriate having someone on this thread who is a skeptic with a open mind, or at least some reasonableness.
It demonstrates that other skeptics can be open minded and reasonable... if they wanted to... or if they were. ;)
You used the word likely, twice. You don't seem sure.
Neither do those promoting the multiverse idea. Our Universe Was Born in a Black Hole
However, why are you talking about expansion.
What expanded... the singularity? What's the singularity? Did that begin?
In any case, there was a...
"design-like?"
Why is it "design-like"? It's evidence of design in nature. It looks designed because it is design(ed).
No. Ha Ha.
No. I said spirit. Not spirits.
No. For the person who doesn't know what evidence is, and would accept only proof for such things, this conclusion would be...
I did.
You are still looking for proof.
How do I know. You repeated the question, althugh the answer has not changed, and you have not explained what evidence is.
I don't know. I just don't see "Start Conversation" when I hover your user name, and when I click it, I get a page error.
Okay. You PM me, then.
Then, in that worldview, evil does not exist, really.
So, an answer to your question - Do people choose to be evil, or is something just messed up...
Yes. I know... How long from now? :D
Demons have been named... long ago. :D
No. Circumstantial evidence does not work like that.
As you should know, if you are into science. There may be more than one explanation, and interpretation.
So you say.
I did. You didn't read the OP??? :openmouth:
I...
You are mistaken.
One has to use a means of measurement, in any field.
For example, a carpenter, has a measuring line handy.
A merchant has scales... and so forth.
The evidence is not the tool,
The evidence is what the tool measures.
The Bible is a tool in this case, that measures the evidence...
You totally missed the point.
I suppose because you isolated something mentioned, as if it was a topic for discussion.
So, the universe began about 13 billion years ago, according to current understanding.
The universe beginning as a singularity DOES NOT HAVE a beginning? :confused:
The Bible is not a science text book, so your statement is irrelevant.
Besides that, what the Bible says about the earth, is significant, because at a time when people thought the earth rested on some object(s) the...
Those are a lot of statements stated dogmatically as facts.
However, we both know they are claims made by someone who simply believes what he says. Don't we.
I'm interested in evidence. You claimed to have proof. The two are not the same.
If you want to discuss evidence, post one. Don't post a whole webpage. I could do the same, and refute the entire page.
I basically did that, though, with one statement.
You're just interested in repeating what you...