The fact you said ths, show you did not pay any attention to what I said.
Consider if this is true... Earth's core is a billion years old
Now add 2.5 years to it. Do you get 4.5 billion years?
Wow. Which part would I find "proof that the "history" in the Bible is not accurate"?
Surely you don't want me to read that long thing, for which I have gone through the parts that expressed the opinions of Biblical critics.
How do you figure opinions are proofs?
You and more than half a billion other. ;)
Again, some persons believe that God had foreknowledge of these event, but my study of the Bible has not led me to that view.
I understand from the Bible that God has control over his ability to foreknow, unlike a robot that is programed with limited...
Yes, I understand that, and if it is, the earth is much younger, like 1.3 billion years old?
The age of the Earth's inner core revised
By creating conditions akin to the center of the Earth inside a laboratory chamber, researchers have improved the estimate of the age of our planet's solid inner...
See here. If that's not enough, and you believe you need more, you can let me know.
Well, the Bible got quite a number of things right, well before scientists discovered them.
I mentioned a few in the OP. See here. If that's not enough, and you believe you need more, you can let me know.
I understand. We all choose a view that seems correct to us.
I have reason to believe what the Bible says about the origin of life, and the evidence continues to accumulate in favor of that.
I comment you open-mindedness. That is also evolving... or rather, eroding away. Not in all people...
The Bible is accurate where history is concerned; when it touches on science; regarding fulfilled prophecy...
It's ahead of its time, and is timeless.
You can test these to see if this is true.
Would it not be put there, by the one whom the same Bible says created the universe?
I don't know of anyone who is "relying on the Bible for answers to scientific questions".
I do know of millions who realize that the Bible is truthful... even when it touches on things that scientists discover...
The Bible is not a science text book.
The writers of the Bible, or the characters are not scientist.
We can test the Bible though, with regard to its reliability.
We only need that, and if it stands up, we know we have a reliable source of truth.
I think the evidence shows it stands up pretty well.
Or, they became that way... you call it evolved. Which would mean they were not that way originally - not their nature... and I don't mean they were some single celled amoeba like organism.
That would explain why there is that "good side", existing in humanity.
If we go in opposite directions...
Uh. Seriously? Have you seen LUCA? Was it recorded? Where can I go sit watch Dark Matter on HDTV?
Why then would anyone want to see a video of demons? Shaking my head in disbelief
That's not faith, as defined prior to the centuries of Old English.... or earlier.
To understand what fait in God is, one need to travel back to the first century CE, and beyond.
Oh yes it does. Thanks for that.
I've been unsuccessful in reaching anyone's sense of reason, with that. So, I now just ignore it.
You have no idea how many times I tried.