The article does not say much really. For example it does not address how Baha'u'llah could be the one whom Jesus is speaking about when He said that the Comforter, the Spirit of Truth would remind Jesus disciples of what Jesus had said to them (John 14:26) or how the Comforter, Spirit of Truth...
You dance around when asked directly. At other times you claim that most of the New Testament is not true because most of the New Testament says things that Baha'i disagrees with and so most of Christianity, including the heart of it, is false.
This of course means that you do not know what...
So you think that the Holy Spirit inspired the gospel writers to write things that are not true.
And also we already know that you deny the truth of Christianity.
John 14:26
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
So when did Baha'u'llah ever remind anyone of what Jesus had said to them?
John 14:3 And if...
True it is not a fact by definition of the word fact, but also you have said that you do not believe Jesus did and said all that the gospels claim, so it is a fact that you do not believe Jesus said and did all that the gospels claim.
And when all that is added together, it means that you go...
That all people except Jesus have sinned.
The God was pleased with Mary.
Same thing except that these days scholars have worked out that parts of the gospels probably are not genuine.
Accepting the inspiration of the gospels contradicts believing that 80% of what Jesus said is not what He...
The immaculacy of the Virgin Mary sounds like he is saying that Mary was sinless. Maybe he thought that is what the Bible taught.
But his quote almost sounds like he thinks that he is defending Christianity and the gospels by defending those things.
As to the position of Christianity, let it be...
True, it is a belief, and it is your belief that it is not a fact.
True, they are not contradictory to each other.
They are contradictory to the Jesus Seminar which give their opinion that the historical Jesus may have said 20% of what the gospels claim.
It is not hard to find quotes from...
Jesus did and said what the gospels claim. Baha'is have hardened their heart against that and in theory they believe what Baha'u'llah and the other infallibles said about the gospels but Baha'u'llah and the infallibles contradict each other and themselves at times and Baha'is end up denying much...
That does not make sense. Scholars can be sceptics.
I suppose that these days the world has the "opinions" of sceptical scholars that many people prefer to view the gospels through.
Nothing has changed then. You still deny what Jesus said what makes the gospel what it is,,,,,, the good news...
I suppose if the Gospels were originally made up stories about Jesus then that would mean that they have not been corrupted. But to say that they are made up stories is to deny their truth.
The Jesus Seminar is looking for the historical Jesus, the one without the supernatural BS.
A teacher...
That is true, it just that the people in the Jesus Seminar are called Biblical scholars that makes the difference in the mind of some who listen to them, but it does not make them any better in determining what Jesus said and did etc.
No they did not determine what the majority of Christians believe is false, they began with the assumptions that anything in the gospels that pointed to these things is false and so eliminated the sayings of Jesus and deeds of Jesus which pointed to the truth of His divinity and anything...
If these same people decided to write the Baha'u'llah Seminars they would probably eliminate all of what he wrote. These people do not believe in the supernatural and the divine inspiration of what Baha'u'llah wrote all they would accept is what history knows about the life and death of the man...
Yes, you have said that only 20% of the sayings of Jesus were said by Jesus, so you have determined to believe the opinions of the skeptics in the Jesus Seminar. That is not about Baha'i faith but imo does show the spirit of the false prophet Baha'u'llah, to deny the words of the Bible. I see...
Of course Baha'is change the Bible. They do not do it officially obviously but when they say they interpret the Bible, it is plain that they do not mean that they have interpreted the official Bible. You even admit to changing the Bible when you claim that 80% of what Jesus said is not what He...
https://www.gotquestions.org/Jesus-seminar.html
If you want to discredit the Jesus of the Bible, you have given authority to the right group, the one that believes in their opinions and beliefs about Jesus over what the Bible tells us about Jesus.
But you don't want to discredit Jesus or the...
Yes there are glaring changes that they make to the Bible yet many of them do not even admit that directly even though they may say that the Bible has been corrupted,,,,,,,,,,,,, which is admitting it really.
When Jesus said "no man" that would include you and me and Baha'u'llah and Moses and the Buddha. (even if you are woman).
So Baha'is say that Jesus the way to the Father during His dispensation but others also were the way to God during His dispensation, just as Baha'u'llah is the way to God...