Logic requires knowledge, and knowledge we gain through awareness, but if our awareness just makes us seem like we have awareness of things, even ourselves, then it stands to reason that all of logic could be false. In other words, the premise of logic itself could be illogical.
There have been many people in this thread who have understood my points made, so I would kindly suggest reading over those to better understand the context of what I've been saying.
There are different types of knowledge, but to say you know something is true to someone who does not share the same faith as you, means you know it for certain, whereas belief means you don't know for certain, but you think something is true. In modern society, a person can say they know...
Ha, right, I should have thought of that.
Not all belief systems are the same. As I just explained in a previous comment: "If one has faith that logic is real, then by extension, many other things are true which don't seem to require extra faith. Having faith in logic is like creating a...
If you know something is true, that means there can be no possibility of yourself being wrong, but I've explained why that never applies to anything, which is why it would seem that faith is required for anything, but since I'm explaining that from not actually knowing anything for certain, I...
Through just having faith that logic exists, so many other things will also be true by extension, and we need to put less effort into believing, but if we could put zero effort into anything, then we wouldn't be able to have faith in logic (we'd also probably be dead or soon to be since logic...
Because you need awareness to use logic, that example I gave expresses that quite clearly, but if our 'awareness' doesn't actually have the effect that we believe it does, if we don't actually exist, and if everything we thought was true through our awareness is actually false, then logic would...
I completely agree with you, which is why for me, I have faith in my religion/philosophy, Flawlessism, which I came to create and have faith in through my experiences in life.
If all of your knowledge is actually false, then logic is no longer logical. Many of us assume that having awareness means we're aware, but this could just be an effect of awareness, much like how a deception can make something seem to be true, the effect of awareness could just be a mental...
When you have full awareness of the situation, yes, but without that awareness, no, because logic does not give awareness of such things, it just allows you to understand what you already know from a logical standpoint. But if our awareness is actually an optical illusion of sorts, then even...
Yes, but that requires awareness, and awareness could be just an illusion, something that seems to make sense but actually is a deception. In other words, all you are doing is explaining what your faith is, but you're not explaining why you have faith.
Look, you can do what you want, but I'll keep using Zero Undefined because it makes sense to me to use it over using Null. To me, I see Null as being something to be used within programming, and Zero Undefined I understand to be used outside of programming, to be Null's equivalent outside of...
Though I presume we all understand the basics of logic which are commonly known, there is a fairly well-known hole in logic that many choose to ignore:
Example: The Paradox of the Literal and Figurative
Imagine someone says, "I'm so hungry I could eat a horse." In traditional logic, if we take...
If I gave you the question: Does nothing truly not exist?
Out of the following possible answers, which one would you choose and why?
A. Nothing does not exist
B. Nothing does exist
C. Unsure
D. Depends on the context
E. Nothing does and doesn't exist
+++
And to give you a short take on...
The type of logic you are using is very flawed, I've long since realized this and stopped using that type of logic. To use logic correctly, you need full awareness of the way things are. Take for example this phrase, "I'm so hungry I could eat an entire horse". Take this statement seriously and...
A straw man was not what I was aiming for, I just wanted to make things clear starting out.
Toys that are destroyed still exist, they merely change form. Just as we exist as humans now, but when we die, our form changes, we do not stop existing.
I feel like you're jumping to conclusions way to...