Suppose no one had ever jump from a building and died, but all the scientists said, "sure, there's a 99% chance you'll die..." you would think at least one scientists would sign a statement supporting this position. But even with this non sequitur analogy, ALL the scientists do not support your...
This is the beauty of the Electoral College. If a candidate is so evil that he or she would be an obvious detriment to the country--say a budding Hitler (and not just a candidate you strongly disagree with) then in most states the EC can vote their consciences and not put this person in office.
Why, yes...yes you would. If you had enough support, then no one would be able to stop you from being president even though there might be a faction out considering you unqualified. As for the ambassadorship, you might want to re-think that. After watching more than a few hours of BBC I have...
Obviously.
Why do you think the qualifications were specifically outlined in the Constitution? It would allow anyone who meets these qualifications --no matter their race, gender, religion, or status in life-- a chance at becoming the President of the US. Isn't that what Progressives and...
Sooo...you saying you don't mean what you say? Just to be clear, here's your direct quote:
What qualifications should a candidate for President have?
The only qualifications that are required have already been stated. If you're not happy with these qualification, change the Constitution.