I think Vance will let Trump rule for a month or two and then force him to take a dementia test (article 25). That way, Vance will not have a full term and has 2 further shots at the Presidency.
I don't. Though the US has helped Ukraine, they weren't the biggest of help. Most of it came from the EU.
Yep. It won't be cheap and will likely be met with disagreement, but in the midterm it will pay out when the €uro replaces the Dollar as reserve currency.
On the one hand, it is good that the US is going down the drain, now. But the successors will 1. have to step up to the challenge and 2. emancipate themselves from the US (at least Europe will have to do that).
The age of pollsters is over. They have been so wrong, so often, that they are in the category of fortune-tellers, now. At least in the US. Polling still seems to work in the rest of the world.
My guess is that people in the US lie habitually. They made the biggest liar President, so much do...
I'm all for unity and see the other side as "loyal opposition", but that ship has sailed with the Trumpists. I can't debate with people who denounce reality and the basic idea of democracy.
Nope.
The most influence on my vote is a thing we've got here in Germany called "Wahl-O-Mat". It's a page, set up by a government organization (bureau for political education). It starts with a questionnaire about my stances on political questions and displays the percentages my views align with...
Not only that, it's also unavoidable.
But sterilizing only women would not only be unfair, it would also increase the imperfection that could be easily gained by equal treatment.
So do I. They don't deserve "scorn", they deserve ridicule. Low effort, low impact, one shot sarcasm - which is not harassment.
(That's the main point here. It's no longer about the silly rules, it's about the question if I'm allowed to make fun of them.)
These silly rules are the beginning of censorship. They aren't dangerous enough to demand boycotts or go out and protest in the streets. It's just enough to make fun of them on RF, point out how silly the rules are. When you are being stupid, a sarcastic remark is the least you should be...
I would be very sceptic, as the result is opposite to "previous experiments". I would look at their sources.
You can do that with the experiment that is running for 250 years now. When the media publishes lists like the one you don't trust, look at the sources, usually numbers published by the...