Totally missed the point.
They were Christians, quoting scripture from the Christian Bible.
They had Christian principles which they based their ideas for government on.
I would if I had to. I don't eat canines because they smell bad and I don't imagine they taste good and they have a lot of parasites. I have eaten bobcat just to try it, so eating a cat would be no biggie but I don't really consider them appealing. Generally, prey animals are better for...
There's obviously a difference, according to the scripture.
God is technically present everywhere but he isn't always manifesting his presence in everything.
We aren't under the old Mosaic laws and the founders understood that. The principle of loving your neighbor as yourself, from Jesus, can apply to a nation of people from all backgrounds.
No they aren't. One is a statement about God the other is a principle of not restricting freedom from anyone. The country isn't God obviously. We don't worship it. But it was founded on ideas from scripture. One of those ideas is that God is no respector of one person over another and we should...
Sure, if it's all that is on the menu.
You'd be surprised what you would eat if it was that or die.
I've had meat some consider weird, muskrats, beaver, bobcat, squirrel. Practically lived in deer for a lot of years. Some taste better than others but it's not an ethical issue with me.
"You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons; you cannot partake of the table of the Lord and the table of demons."
"But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons,"
pow·er
/ˈpou(ə)r/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Politics
Law
Military
Religion
Physics
Sport
Electrical
Mathematics
noun
1.
the ability to do something or act in a particular way, especially as a faculty or quality.
"the power of speech"
Similar:
ability
capacity...