Erm...If you really wanna get down into what qualifies as a civilian, there are going to be certain issues since military service is pretty much mandatory in Israel, which entails that the massacre on Oct 7th could be interpreted as essentially an attack against soldiers (either potential or...
Killing the ones responsible without bombing the whole place nor causing a massacre among civilians.
I think you might not have paid attention to what I stated. Netanyahu is responsible for far far more civilian deaths than Hamas since it's founding.
As for the comparison with the nazi, about...
It is not just about international recognition though. Israel won't treat Palestine as a nation, and the USA won't stop Israel. It is a never ending cycle of breeding terrorist groups through violence and expecting to solve everything with an iron fist.
Why not? Netanyahu is responsible for far more civilian deaths than Hamas in it's whole history.
It is one thing to fight back and yet another to perform a massacre.
This is a very simplistic perspective.
I take it that when you say 'human beings' you are referring to the instantiations of the concept (as in the individual human beings, rather than the category itself). If so, no disagreement on my part.
What are you calling 'reality'? As in the sum of all things that exist? If so, I agree this...
The issue is that you said: "There are no a priori premises related to reality". Married men and bachelors are not merely abstractions without any relation to reality. Those are labels that describe properties of real individuals.
Or, by 'related to reality' do you mean that the property itself...
Why do you presume we need more factual premises to reach the conclusion that existence can have no source? A priori reasoning is sufficient to reach this conclusion.