It is literally written. Claiming doesn't make it so, but it is written so.
Ha. You merely claimed so, but provided absolutely no substantion. It is curious that you accuse me of merely claiming things while you are the one guilty of doing so.
Once again, only claiming...
It doesn't stand...
I know, but since women pass-by a huge number of people every single day without getting attacked, how did you reach the conclusion that you are more likely to be attacked by a man in the woods than a bear?
To measure probability you need to take into consideration how many times an event...
I am trying to understand your claim here. Do you mean a man can maintain an erection strictly on the basis of aggression and violence without being sexually aroused? Or do you mean that a man can become sexually aroused through the use of violence and aggression?
If the latter, no disagreement...
Ok. You have established the odds of a bear attacking you are very small through your experiences. How have you established the odds of a man attacking you in the woods?
What makes people think that homophobics are closeted homosexuals is due to how often they frame homosexuality as a matter of choice.
If you are heterosexual, you wouldn't frame it like that. If, however, you are homosexual or bisexual, and had to actively choose to engage only in heterosexual...
What do you mean by "nearly-of-age"? As in being nearly an adult? Here in Brazil it is odd because you become an adult by 18 but can consent to sex (with nearly anyone) by 14.
I always dislike these remarks about rape not being about sex, because even though it is often not about sex, there are many times where it is also about sex. Generally speaking, if there is an intercourse involving an erected penile, you can count on it involving sexual gratification as being...
I quoted multiple versions to make it clear that Paul was speaking of nature. There is absolutely no ground to speak of it as being simply a cultural reference.
It doesn't have to be a sin.
There is absolutely no reason, once again, to presume that this is a mere cultural reference. It is...
It is not a matter of cultural reference at all. This is clearly stated. Period.
KJV:
14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
NIV:
14...
First things first. What I have said is: Consider the rule, rather than the exception, where most woman that keep their hair short do so just because they prefer it that way.
In other words, what I am saying is that the reason as to why most Christian women with short hair keep it like that has...
How?
Why do you presume there is any significant number of rapists among illegal immigrants?
Why do you presume that trans women are likely to rape biological women?
Why do you presume that modesty and good manners are an effective way to prevent rape?
Been done already.
Exception.
Exception.
I asked you to provide a justification for the rule, rather than the exception. And the reason you have not provided any is simple: there is none.
The fact is that most Christians simply ignore what is written in the bible whenever it is convenient to do so.
And the justification on this case for not adhering to what is clearly stated in the New Testament (not in the Old Testament) would be... ?
Consider the rule, rather than the exception, where most woman that keep their hair short do so just because they prefer it that way.