Well, in that case, your father was wrong. When you are one, you are not one year old. You are 1 year and 9 months old.
Therefore, when you are six, one year would not be a sixth of your life. It would be less than that.
Pretty simple arithmetic, don't you think?
Ciao
- viole
Well, then illuminate me on the part that is wrong. I am ready to debate all of my arguments.
Otherwise, I will simply chalk that out as "You are wrong, but I don't know where".
Ciao
- viole
Oh, OK. However, still totally nonsensical.
Is that something like this?
Oh please Jesus, make the cancer therapy work, for I am not sure I will spend the rest of eternity with you, vs. being fried for all eternity, because of Your numerus clausus for Heaven admission.
Is that so?
Ciao
- viole
Yeah, but according to the manual they follow, they will not die. Jesus took that famous Passover weekend off, so that they will live. There is no death for them.
Therefore, I am not sure what your point is. Especially because apart from some decades, which are totally insignificant when...
the main question to ask is what logic is followed when praying, so that the sick dear one, or oneself, stays longer in what is believed to a be a corrupted place. A valley of tears. Which will be eventually replaced by a far better home, anyway. Where they will meet Jesus in complete bliss. Why...
Yes and no. But why is that a problem?
That is what a miracle is. If you had a natural explanation for what God did, they would not be miracles. So, you are basically claiming that theists cannot invoke miracles, because miracles are not possible. Which is equivalent to claiming that theists...
Since wine is about 85% water, probably all He did was to add 15% of something else to make the difference. Surely within the skills expected by an almighty God, or at least a third of Him/Them.
And much less impressive than, say, parting a sea. Or living three days inside a big tuna.
Ciao
-...
Very well said. I would add that anyone defending the pope in this instance, or any other instances, is manifestly homophobic. And misogynistic.
But that is OK. After all, the pope can decide who gets in his church and who does not. The problem is not him, but the organization, and its moral...
Well, the Vatican apologized, which it very rarely does, for people having been hurt by the use of a word. Which means, he used that word.
Which is is typical of this pope. When on record, he pays lip service to sell an enlightened Catholic Church. For pure marketing reasons, considering the...