No sane engineer would have designed the eye like that. I think it would go into the SD category. And increasingly popular alternative to ID.
Ciao
- viole
OK. I am not presuming to speak for all theists. In fact, I am speaking for no possibly existing theist, since I claimed they should publish their proof if they had any.
And the set of all people who have proof of God, is the empty set.
Ciao
- viole
I would first ask the question whether hell is a rational idea. Only when you have passed that test, you can start ask about Hell's properties. Otherwise, it would be like asking whether it is rational to say that fairies are invisible, and have an obsession for gardens.
Ciao
- viole
If they had proof? Of course.
Alas, they do not have any. I mean, proof is a big word when they do not even the smallest shred of evidence. All of them.
Ciao
- viole
That could include you. What makes you think that Jesus is not a Satan lie intended to damn as many people as possible?
I am sure you also noticed a pretty big change of attitude from the God of the OT.
Honestly, if I had been Satan, I would have done exactly that.
Ciao
- viuoleviole
Since they all have the same evidence, then yes. All those beings are ontologically equivalent. There is no rational reason to believe in gods, and not in leprechauns. Or garden fairies. Or the other way round.
And if that sounds offending, I am sorry. Alas, perceived insult does not magically...