I'm not talking about who built Xois the city, I am asking specifically about the 14th Dynasty.
Who were they?
Where did they come from?
What period did they rule?
What was their relationship to the 13th Dynasty?
No, your example was an extremely poor one, and is therefore ineffectual to describe what you wanted it to.
By hiring an unlicenced driver, the employer becomes more than just "vicariously liable".
You need to accept your example is flawed, since the premise of hiring an unlicenced driver in...
There are 2 dynasties running concurrently from 1803BCE, the Pharoahic 13th Dynasty with its capital in Itjtawy (Pitom), and the Kingly 14th Dynasty with its capital in Xois located in the central Nile delta. We can consider this date as being approximate to when Joseph is considered to have...
Keeping in mind "Names" can include titles and descriptions, I note significance with the following
Chapter 1
Joseph
Melech (King of Egypt)
Pharoah
Pitom
Ramesses
I've explained the significance of these in this thread.
Chapter 2-3
Levi
Mother (birth)
Mother (nurse)
Mother (foster)
Sister...
To repeat myself again, I have never objected to any of the documented evidence within history, archaeology, etc etc.
I have only objected to "confirming the Exodud and Joshua accounts as literal history"
Greek/Latin means Christian.
I am more than happy to rephrase.
If you think I am looking to uphold any literal reading of the scriptures you are grossly mistaken.
I beg to differ.
What you are implying is the priest was hired by the church knowing he wasn’t fit for duty.
My analogy fits with the High Court decision.
I have never once denied any evidence, and in fact my subjective opinion of the scriptures is founded by it.
If you think I am looking to uphold the literal Greek/Latin reading of the scriptures you are grossly mistaken.
You can't force a graph to represent something just because you want it to.
I don't think you have the basic understanding down to be able to discuss this.
Again, you are not understanding what the diagram is showing.
You have 2 times to choose from, and you keep picking the wrong one.
It is already done by figure 5-10.
The only way to express C on that diagram is for an object to move through space without experiencing time.
This is the x-axis.
I am quoting from a source you clearly do not understand.
WRONG. It travels 0.8 light year of space in 1 year.
You aren't being mindful of the TWO aspects of time being described.
:facepalm:
Your hypothetical is all over the place.
It doesn't make sense since it implies a crime being committed BEFORE he "ran someone over".
Here is a better analogy.
You are given a taxi voucher by a charity as a "thank you" so you can get home. The voucher is funded by the government.
You use...
Have you read the book or only looked at the graphs?
To understand what those graphs are explaining you need to "be mindful of two aspects, or projections, of time"
(a) The time observed to be required for the journey
(b) The time the travellers reckons
The 0.8 and 0.6 is described well...