I do most of my research these days in interdisciplinary fields and quantum foundations (and related areas). A nice thing about foundations is that questions which were largely "taboo" in physics (and often provoked open hostility) regarding what our best theories tell us about reality (or...
If that were true, then QM would be deterministic.
Classical mechanics makes use of the continuum. Specifically, Newtonian mechanics and extensions involve observables and units (distances, lengths, mass, momentum, time) that we treat in terms of intervals on product spaces of the real numbers...
Here you go:
Free randomness can be amplified
That’s as good a place to start as many (albeit probably not any, but I don’t have unlimited time to determine the optimal starting place given the data), and here’s an accompanying video by one of the authors:
Firstly, “predetermined” is not a...
Absolutely. And in addition to coming quite close to developing the scientific endeavor in antiquity, Greek thought was absolutely fundamentally at play in early modern natural philosophy and more general academic/scholarly thought at the time. Indeed, I am not at all sure that one could have...
Actually, I was quoting from a physics monograph there, you'd have to take that claim up with Haag. My claim is that the action principle was clearly and obviously a development from theological principles. Those who developed it were quite clear about their rationale. They happened to be right...
"The orthodox view of the nature of the laws of physics contains a long list of tacitly assumed properties. The laws are regarded, for
example, as immutable, eternal, infinitely precise mathematical relationships that transcend the physical universe, and were imprinted on it at the moment of its...
I'm not sure it qualifies as a an argument from ignorance fallacy, but rather is something closer to the "plain non sequitur" case. And even that is generous of you.
Just to name one counter-example that renders such an absurd and extreme claim as the one you make above (my goodness, I'm not a believer or an historian but a scientist and even I know the the debt we physicists owe to the "theological physics" of the early modern founders from Galileo and...
In non-relativistic mechanics (including quantum mechanics, actually, but here I'll be talking about classical non-relativistic mechanics) basically everything is relative. You have a (sort of)) privileged class of reference frames (as is true in special relativity) called inertial reference...
FYI-
That is an answer for someone who doesn't have a wife. It is also true that someone who doesn't have a wife cannot beat their wives. Likewise (just as a fun example I happen to like and which stuck with me), "the statement, 'All eleven-legged alligators are orange with blue spots' is true...
It's strange to assert that atheism is defined as a "lack of belief" and then speak of evidence at all. In general, one can have evidence for one's beliefs, one's disbeliefs, even one's uncertainty regarding the truth or falsehood of a claim/proposition/etc.
It is hard to imagine how one can...
Strictly speaking, the above is not exactly true. Firstly because of the variability with respect to the actual claims involved, but more importantly because stricter experimental control that actual investigates the variability of the environment of the liquids as well as whether or not the...
I spend almost all my time within scientific communities, as I am a scientist. My background is mostly in theoretical physics (especially quantum foundations) as well as the statistical physics of complex systems, but years ago when I was just starting out in graduate research I worked as an...
Rather easily, I would think. If someone asks me "do you believe in creationism?" then I don't need to know in which particular way they mean to assert which particular creator actually "created" the universe (life? Earth? etc.) in what particular manner in order to answer "no."
And more...
What is the point of trying to "educate" those whose familiarity with and understanding of scientific methods and the nature of science by presenting a fundamentally flawed, mischaracterization of the actual practice of science, the way that scientists understand and use evidence, and finally...
We teach children (despite decades of attempts at reform), as well as some popular/sensationalist science presentations. However, it makes little to no contact with how scientific inquiry actually works, the nature of science (NOS), actual scientific practices & methods, or indeed with the ways...
Yes. The relevance here was that your criterion was not stringent enough. That is, it is not enough to ask
This is what I meant by "wrong question". The problem is that you are not asking for enough evidence. Detection itself can be problematic in the extreme, which was the entire point of...
Why? Let's suppose, for the moment, that we will not compare Galilean or Newtonian spacetime to the spacetimes of special and general relativity. Those proponents of the block universe view have generally built their cases upon special, not general relativity. The reason for this is quite...