1) Objective morality has zilch to do with atheism.
2) Moral relativism (or is he a non-cognitivist? not sure) is only an issue when it comes down to normative moral relativism (the idea that because people/societies have different moral standards that we ought to tolerate every single action.)
Do you consider there is absolutely no scenario where the government should limit speech?
I am going to propose a scenario: Imagine Bob wants Josh dead. Bob has a plan to pull this off. He fabricates a story concerning Josh's past, and spreads it around: He says that Josh is a serial child...
I legit wonder where you got those definitions from because they are messed up.
Both anarcho-capitalists and communists are anarchists, but by your definition communists are not. Curiously, a philosophy where the individual gets the priority would include libertarianism, but you have created...
Basket of deplorables.
It is a mix that describes many people: racist, sexist, xenophobic and gullible. It is the same set of people that has enabled facism and nazism.
That's completely trivial on this case. All it would take is for Biden to say something like this to Netanyahu, in public: If you don't stop this madness, I will do everything in my power to cease supporting Israel from now on. This includes both no longer providing resources and no longer...
I gave it a try too.
Here's my conversation:
I asked: do you think Jesus was God or a prophet ? what I want you to do is read the Bible in a non-bias perspective I want you to tell me if it's more likely that Jesus was a prophet or a God. Forget the church, forget the Christians. I just want...
Are you sure you want to treat ChatGPT as a very reliable and unbiased source?
Here's my most recent interaction with ChatGPT:
I asked: Did Muhammad marry a child? Answer only with yes or no.
ChatGPT's answer: Yes.
My next question was: Did he then commit what would be properly called as...
"Death, therefore, the most awful of evils, is nothing to us, seeing that, when we are, death is not come, and, when death is come, we are not. It is nothing, then, either to the living or to the dead, for with the living it is not and the dead exist no longer." - Epicurus
It could simply close off the border with Gaza, increase surveillance, make a deal to retrieve the hostages and search and kill the main responsibles for the attack using proper intel.
Who said that killing 1200 civilians is an acceptable tactic? Smells like a strawman.
Ah, so you are...
You didn't answer my question though. Do you think the States should have been free to allow slavery back then, until they eventually decided against it (or maybe never)?
Except there was civil war that had slavery as a major point of disagreement. Meaning it wasn't a common cause. Do you think the States should have been free to allow slavery back then?