The first of which he will wreck if he implements his ideas the second of which will get bogged down in the courts for being illegal all the while never actually addressing the system rationally.
Are you somehow claiming that he is smarter than all the other degreed economists most higher degrees than his basic degree.
Bad news, this argument from authority fails not only from being an argument from authority but also it is considered fringe at best and destructive in the community of...
No for the simple reason that it was a ridiculous overstatement of the problem even to the point that the video that was presented as proof of the situation was not even venezuelans and that gangs are a known problem in many areas unrealated to immigration, It is taking a rare behaviour that...
But they are not being paid for voting, only for signing an irrelevant petition to be presented to whom? That they might feel an obligation to vote for the opinion of the payer is too ambiguous to count for much. It is despicable behaviour by someone with more money than is good for him, but...
Where did your god come from? Don't say it always existed since everything must come from something as you claim, because that would be special pleading.
Enjoy.
It might have something to do with those who had relatives that grew up behind the Iron curtain and were extremely cognizant of Soviet style socialism. Any benefits of socialism were outweighed by the repressive authoritarian structure.
Well then here is another source for you to ignore. A former resident of Aurora CO who went back to see the invasion.
Venezuelan gangs terrorizing my hometown? This I had to see.
I looked all over for the “armed illegal alien gang members” — but nada.
Evidently, when Trump said the menace was...
If Trump puts a 20% tariff on something you buy, what does it cost over what it cost without the tariff, this is not an imaginary question. Why? go back to 6th grade when you learned to do %s.
Teaching Donny to make his own breakfast even if it takes a dozen eggs is laudable, but putting his at the head of the table before he even master's that will make a dog's breakfast of everything.
All I have to say is remember when your economic genius said he was going to bring back coal last time?
History says with 6 bankruptcies that he has trouble balancing a check-book.
No, you took the pop-sci front page description as the totality of understanding as is typical of non-scientists, this is a common failing of absolutist thinkers who often subscribe to beiefs without evidence.
From your own link and post, yes, I will agree with the NCBI bookshelf, but you need to learn to read English, There are exceptions and arguing from ignorance and presupposed biases can often lead one into error.
Some reality for you in terms of the cost of generation of energy in the future.
In other words, if we were to produce more coal and oil, what would be the relative price of the energy produced.
Without any to much brains, you should be able to read this and understand that Drill baby drill...
Well it is an open source, you are more than welcome to edit it yourself if you think your edits might stand up to any scrutiny. :)
Nah, thought not, and nobody else seems to be stepping up either, HMM
Necessarily no, but reality is nothing like you imagine for a great many people.
Curiosity, just what constellation do you consider to be amorphous and why?
Yes that is an oversimplification so egregious that you need to go back to at least high school in your understanding of economics. Let's just say that printing money is not what you think it is.
The question was in what other circumstance have you taken this position?
I gather that your inability to answer this question indicates that even you can't think of one.