No, I know I'm speaking to a person because I have seen tens of thousands of people over the course of my lifetime and can see them, touch them, and confirm through others that they can see and touch them. Ditto for a fork or a tree.
I am not in any way religious, but you are closer to Biblical standards on this question than other Christians, to be sure. The Bible specifically says that your god places ALL leaders on the seat of power. This means to resist the election of any president, or even the ascendency of any...
I would think different people wrote all of the individual stories compiled into the Bible and at least one different individual wrote the Quran. Sound evidence to the contrary is invited.
Yes, not all Christians are creationists. They either ignore, or "interpret" what they read to fit any new thing confirmed by science and ignore the fact that the writers could not possibly have believed what the interpreter believes.
It very much matters in many cases, as beliefs inform actions. Do I care if someone believes Brussel's sprouts taste good? No. do I care if someone believes anyone who doesn't believe in their particular god should be killed? Yes.
You read something that is not accurate. Atheism CAN be the belief that there is not god (supernatural beings in general are another question not covered by atheism)but is is most often a lack of belief in a god. It is a rejection of a claim due to unconvincing evidence.
I think that the company actually said 94.5% efficacy, not effectiveness. they are different things. Efficacy is effectiveness under tightly controlled conditions and ideal circumstances. Effectiveness is how it does out in the real world. But I quibble.....it is certainly good news.
Seems we have continued to politicize and bicker instead of coming together and tamping it down. A fair share of the population believes that their right to not wear a mask trumps (pun intended) other's right to protection from a disease that is sickening and killing people at the rate of over...
I would call them mistaken. How did you determine that you were speaking with an entity of any kind in the first place, much less that they were a demon?
You might have an argument if 1) we could be sure we actually know what Jesus said, and not what some one else says he said and (2 everything Jesus is purported to have said is actually good advice.
I prefer secular humanism. I do not believe either religious dogma or a single individuals "heart" is sufficient to work out the overarching concept of morality.