It is good when things aren't obvious; that affords an opportunity to take the time to discern the right thing to do and not the hasty thing (which may not be the right thing).
I was not in the disease's crosshairs for a bad case, and the shot was experimental, with too many cases of harmful side effects. The risk/benefit calculation clearly pointed to obtaining natural antibodies. So that's what I did.
I'm not sure how you made your decision, but mine was not made...
Miracles are to strengthen those who already trust the giver of the miracle (God). Long-ago miracles cannot be proven by men to anyone. Miracles happen today. I have witnessed them; been involved in their occurrence. Nor can these contemporary miracles be proven to anyone by another. But...
No, I don't believe them. The only people we should ever be against are those who advocate for the destruction of the rights of others, or who actually perpetrate such. Otherwise we are all family.
Good thread.
Well, no one can accuse you of hoarding your thoughts. You've made more posts than anyone else by well over double. You've averaged over 47 posts a day... every day... since joining. That's... a lot.
Sorry I missed the post.
Was there any social consideration given to my decision? Not really. Maybe secondarily. Ultimately, if I don't judge a substance suitable for injection into my body (I didn't in this case), it's not going into my body. After that, perhaps I would have taken the shot...
Just as left-wing disinformation works on the poorly informed. Neither statement offers anything of value to the discussion, just attempts to foment contention.
More to the point, if you have a source showing the salient detail, I'd love to see it.
In both cases I would say there is good chance of being held liable. In neither case would I expect a charge of "attempted murder." But that's what is being asserted in this thread, per the OP. The OP asserts that the persons who built the gallows art built it for the purpose of hanging...
Apologies. Many responses were in front of me all at once, including several from you. I confused your post with that of someone else, who had already found fault with my decision making. I didn't think I needed to be belted over and over.