so personally I do not have a positive or negative a priori about the new age even if in French-speaking Europe it is a rather pejorative word.
on the other hand, as much as I don't agree with everything about this movement, I find that some people attack it too gratuitously without knowing it...
yes once again it's not moksha that bothers me.
I just find the idea that some people have of casting the individual into an undifferentiated background to be gloomy.
if it is real indeed I prefer the sufferings of samsara.
I think, however, that another soteriology would be possible, where...
if it's the perpetual return of the same yes it's hell
we can, however, imagine a perpetually ascending cycle.
This is the belief of some Western spiritualists.
nothing but before I had an austere vision of moksha, I thought it was about blending into brahman like a drop of water in the ocean.
it looked even more terrible to me
À mince je vois de le voir que je l'avais mis en français , c'est bizzare je suis pourtant sûr de l'avoir copier coller deux fois en anglais mais au moment de le mettre il s'est réécris en français (sûrement la traduction de mon navigateur)
Enchanté !
par curiosité intellectuelle et spirituelle, je me suis intéressé à diverses religions peu connues.
En ce moment je découvre la religion du Kayam Panth mais j'ai vu qu'il y avait relativement peu d'informations sur cette religion en anglais.
Si vous pratiquez cette religion ou en savez plus, je...
I believe in a little-known doctrine called polypantheism.
In polypantheism, the Gods are omnipresent.
they are all "everything" but without being reduced to a numerical or consciousness uniqueness.
I believe that every human being has come to earth to unite with his Gods.
In a sense each God...
asserts that there is a third path. which understands the union with the divine without losing its individuality.
beyond the dichotomy beyond "either one or the other"
this way I know it exists even if I haven't found it quite yet.
it is a way which proposes to be Gods in God.
I do not agree with you when you say that deification is incompatible with union with all. in forms of Christian orthodoxy it is even very common among mystics.
I think you misunderstood me or maybe it's me who's not clear and in this case it doesn't matter.
it is not a question here of being a slave to anyone but of keeping in touch with the source or God.
just as a son by becoming a father can keep in touch with his Son.
the middle is not a...
why was the middle path not considered?
to be deified and totally free while being in contact with God?
what would make you so crazy inside?
why not go beyond any dichotomy?
I am quite close to the apeirotheism vision except that it seems to conceive the multiplicity of Gods as limited in time and space. I see them omnipresent.