I think you need to read further to find the humor. Some subjects are allowed a rather light tone.
You may actually find much of the site quite amusing as well as informative.
wa:do
Interesting, but I'm having a hard time with figuring out how this is different from what we already know about phenotypic plasticity and eppigenetics.
wa:do
There are just as many example supporting sexual selection as refuting it.
Not every trait is selected for via. hard sexual selection... but that doesn't mean that no traits are. Very few traits serve a single purpose (sex) most pull double (sex,social signal) or triple (sex, social and...
Laws are really just mathematical constructs that describe simple mechanics.
Evolution does have a lot of mathematics to describe it's mechanics, but it's not a purely mathematical discipline.
wa:do
there are lot's of rules in evolution.
Some examples include:
Hardy-Weinberg
Mendel's laws of inheritance
Differential fitness
Metabolic scaling
Bergman's rule
Cope's rule
Just for example.
wa:do
This is a mystery... but I'm not sure it's "the biggest".
Most likely replication started before life did... viruses and prions are both non-living replicators and experiments show that certain molecules can self-replicate under the proper conditions.
Relatively simple RNA sequences can...
No... as I said the actual term "hopeful monster" isn't really used because it's both misunderstood and flawed. The fact you ignore that part of my post is not my problem.
"Hopeful monsters" are discussed just not under that designation.
Speciation via polyploidy and endosymbiotic events are examples of the "hopeful monster" concept and is covered in every reputable book on general biology. As well as any intro book on evolution, genetics and botany.
For example both are discussed in length in the following:
Biology: 7th ed...
I think you should study a bit more about what evolution actually is.... and which creationist claims are hoaxes vs. which ones are misrepresentations.
wa:do
Actually the reality of "hopeful monsters" has been accepted for quite some time.
Evo Devo is an accepted part of modern evolution. Hell, we covered the subject in my introductory courses when I was going for my Bachelors. And in more detail in specific classes on evolution and genetics. I...
That doesn't make any sense...
One, selection can be measured. There are hundreds (if not thousands) of papers on the subject.
Two, a mechanism isn't physical thing... a mechanism is a process that drives the outcome of a particular event.
Genetic Drift isn't a material component. That...