Both still followed by Exodus 20:5
"You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,"
Even if your first proposition were true, which it isn't, no it does not need to be capitalised unless used at the start of a sentence or as part of a proper name (e.g. the "Science Museum" in London).
No, they just demand quickly rising mountain ranges, that is the scenario that you proposed. That massive adjustment needs to have taken place between the flood and the first documented evidence of the existence of the features.
What that does mean is that Volcanos thousands of feet high need...
No it doesn't. The Bible is full of occasions when it applies different rules depending on whether the person is one of God's chosen people or not. The rules of Slavery are a prime example.
So a thousand years of massive tectonic activity as whole mountain ranges all over the world rose thousands of feet? Repeated volcanic eruptions and meteor strikes and no one bothers to mention it?
Take English, the language that we are using to converse. It has a huge number of words that are recent inventions because they are not present in middle english, the form of the language that Chaucer used. Middle english has enough differences to require specific study to understand.
Go back...
No one claims that there are scientific theories just that they are scientific hypotheses.
Multiverses may indeed be testable. That makes the concept falsifiable.
I'd fully agree with that. Lavosier's arrest had nothing to do with his science. He was an aristocrat and (by association) a tax collector. Two things that would have put his life in peril even if he had never done any science.
Please provide evidence that a non-breach birth would necessarily result in drowning. Remember that successful head-first births have been observed with Dolphins and whether its born flukes or head first the animal still can't breathe until its fully emerged and also reaches the surface.
In...
Still no attempt to justify your claim that human common ancestry with other apes is racist.
Humans are apes, you are not God's specially created little snowflake. Deal with it.
Oh FFS, you really are trotting out some ridiculous propaganda now.
That part of the animatrix was an allusion to slavery in the US, something that started well before Darwin. So yes the robot is supposed to bring to mind black people being mistreated, owned as property and killed on a whim...
He was 100% correct on that point.
There is enough, but the DNA evience is a slam dunk on the subject. We are descended from apes, we are apes and chimps are our "cousins".
No its not racist, you keep repeating this BS claim but have provided no evidence how a simple statement that ALL...