• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The only one who got the burden of proof backwards is you. I provided the sources, and you provided empty assertions yet, you want me to proof that your empty assertions are wrong! What are you talking about? Guess what? The original sources do just that, and till you provide your credible...
  2. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The Miller Urey experiment was found to be false more than half a century ago, yet it’s still used by evolutionists as an achievement, even so, if you evaluate the result, you will see that some amino acids are extremely far from the complexity of the simplest living system or even the simplest...
  3. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I appreciate it. sorry for the long post. I know I have this habit of wordy long posts which can be annoying. thank you. have a good night.
  4. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Operational science deals with the present and arrives at conclusions based on repeated observations of existing phenomena. Events of the past are not repeatable. Conclusions are made only on the basis of interpreting presently available information and therefore cannot draw definitive...
  5. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    you don't have enough memory for anything. you run in circles all the time and repeat your error all the time. you don't learn and do not want to learn. you are not serious. anyways it's up to you. you are free.
  6. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The Miller Urey experiment again? Didn’t I explain it was false because the gases he used (a reactive mixture of methane and ammonia) don’t match the conditions of early Earth? When Miller repeated the experiment using the correct combo of gases in 1983, he failed to repeat original results of...
  7. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    The laryngeal nerve again? As if we didn’t already discuss it long time ago? It’s not that you can’t understand, you really don’t want to understand. Anyways, you are free. Here is the previous discussion of the laryngeal nerve. See #3163 Darwin's Illusion | Page 159 | Religious Forums
  8. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I’m sorry but your subjective opinion is no more than worthless empty claims. Historical science draws its data from records of past events. It utilizes specific verification methodology such as comparing primary and secondary sources as well as several independent witnesses. In the case of...
  9. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Again, it’s not just Denis Noble and No, Noble’s work is taken very seriously. There is no credible scientific criticism of his work. Your opinion means nothing. Stop the empty assertions without any justification other than because you said so. If you don’t agree, provide a credible scientific...
  10. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Yes, just like that. Aladdin's genie, the Twilight Zone, LUCA and the dancing elephants, etc.
  11. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Thank you for your response. If the target is the truth, then forgive me for being candid. It doesn’t work otherwise. First, if God is capable of canceling out any existing imperfection and had protected the developing embryo of Jesus from anything hurtful due to the inheritance from Mary...
  12. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    No, the universe is the sum of causally dependent constituents, i.e., contingent entities. The sum of contingent entities doesn’t constitute a non-contingent. For example, your car includes numerous components, each component is caused. The sum of these components, i.e., the car must also be...
  13. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Not at all, I never said or implied that for the ToE to be true then a single gene function should effect a major change. I’m talking about advantages gradual changes towards a new body plan that supports wings, use as much time as needed, random mutation and natural selection as postulated by...
  14. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    What is the point? Do you mean that the change happened only in one population then it must be a random change? Not necessarily, maybe the conditions (environmental pressures) were slightly different. The living cells have mechanisms for choosing which mutations will occur depending on need...
  15. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    In this case, it wouldn’t be a replication error. I explained the cell mediated /directed mutations many times and provided multiple sources. All what you do is deny as if your mere denial has any value. It doesn’t. Non-Random Directed Mutations Confirmed. - YouTube It's not my claims, #1245...
  16. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I don’t think random mutation (DNA replication errors) work at all other that damaging the original function of a gene. Regardless of any wishes/fairytales about LUCA transforming into elephants, such imagination doesn’t work. I’m neither a child nor an incapacitated adult. It has every thing...
  17. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    First, do you think that there is no inheritance from the mother side? Wasn’t the mother (Mary) a human and according to your creed inherited the sin from Adam? Jesus, the son of Mary would have been also born into imperfection because of his mother. Weekly Dose of Wonder: Why we get more genes...
  18. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    You’re the one who shared the Wiki article. I shared the Nature article below which is also one of the many other references included in the Wiki article (not the only source) but sure, that article reflects the latest understanding of what happened in Lenski’s “Escherichia Coli” experiment. It...
  19. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    Says logic. The beginning must be a source that have existed infinitely/uncaused. Other options are either “infinite regress" or “circular reasoning". Both are logically false.
  20. LIIA

    Darwin's Illusion

    I.e., the ToE. I guess you didn’t pay attention but the definition I wrote was the specific definition of mutation. Go back and read it. There is. It’s called the ToE. Ernst Mayr said that evolutionary biology doesn’t belong to the exact sciences. See #331 Darwin's Illusion | Page 17 |...
Top