Well your bias is pretty evident I would say lol!
When you start believing a theory of science has been proven and should be taught as fact you have created a religion that also has dangers and subverts students to your beliefs.
My debate question was:
Does Intelligent Design Require a God or...
Well we will have to disagree then because just a modification of a function is not evolution.
Population genetics tries to hard to claim things are evolution that can be explained through other causes.
Intelligent design does not eliminate the possibility of evolution. They are not mutually exclusive.
Could the life forms we see on this earth have been seeded here by an advanced race of beings?
Dawkins allowed for that possibility and so it is intelligent design but without any religious...
One of the reasons I believe evolutionists and creationists get into heated battles is because religions and specifically the Christian religion has made intelligent design synonymous with a belief in a God or Super Natural Being and that completely ignores the other forms that Intelligent...
Intelligent design is not just a religious based belief.
Transpermia and Panspermia could also result through intelligent or planned seeding of a planet to start life. No "God" is necessary.
Theistic evolution refers to a belief in a God or supernatural being that somehow used their power to...
I asked you to show what math claim was made and you failed.
Therefore your trolling for attention can be dismissed.
You claimed math was necessary and I proved it was not and can be answered with a simple test of stepping off the empire state building and surviving.
You have offered nothing...
Bacterial resistance is NOT evidence of evolution:
"Antibiotic resistance occurred by a loss of information."
Mutations harmed the ribosome of the bacteria so that antibiotics were not able to attach. This made the individuals resistant; however, it came about from a loss of information. No...
You have claimed I need math to prove my opinion.
I claim I do not and therefore the burden of proof is on you.
You can either use your math or take a step off that building and prove the odds of survival.
Either way I will be proven correct.
I will be waiting....
Looks more like you are trolling and if you would like to prove what I said is wrong the empire state building is in Manhattan, New York City, on Fifth Avenue between West 33rd and 34th Streets.
You are taking a huge leap of faith claiming life from inorganic elements can create/form organic life. That is no different than the belief you can jump off the empire state building and survive. It flies in the face of mathematical odds and reason.
I did not declare anywhere it was not...
Thanks for sharing your philosophy!
Evolution by natural selection within a species makes sense and is seen everyday as humans choose a mate because of certain physical traits that will be passed on to the next generation.
Evolution of one species to another is a much harder theory to explain...
Yes and I am more than willing to look at all possibilities and you seem to have a limited view.
Is a theory of spontaneous origin of life from non living elements possible?
Yes but certainly against all reasonable odds.
There are many other theories as to the origin of life and mechanisms of...
I can say jumping off the empire state building and surviving is possible. When you calculate the odds you see that it is not a viable or even a realistic possibility and is considered preposterous. Hanging on to that method/theory of evolution is just as preposterous in my opinion.
I have done...