• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. AndromedaRXJ

    Did Trump come from a monkey?

    That sounds like dismissal. I can't make that decision until I start hearing them speak. Honestly, if they're both unknown, then I probably wouldn't know the latter has a Ph.D. I don't see a situation where I know someone has a PhD and he's also unknown. As I said above, I have to hear...
  2. AndromedaRXJ

    Did Trump come from a monkey?

    Is there some other reason you're pointing out his education background? Whichever one does a better job at backing up what they're saying. There's also a number of other factors that can determine who I'd rather listen to. Let me rephrase. Other languages have a word for ape, but they're...
  3. AndromedaRXJ

    Did Trump come from a monkey?

    It's not true for humans either. These are all true (for extant apes, anyway), but I can also sit here and list all the differences between New World Monkeys and Catarrhinis (Old World Monkeys and apes), which would result in a greater list than yours. It also means that, even considering your...
  4. AndromedaRXJ

    Did Trump come from a monkey?

    That is a very unfair dismissal of someone just because he lacks the right piece of paper. His education background/history really shouldn't matter when he cites everything he says in his video with proper academic sources. You don't need a degree to have a sound argument. Fact: Many...
  5. AndromedaRXJ

    Did Trump come from a monkey?

    We're still monkeys, so yeah. Trump came from his parents, who are monkeys.
  6. AndromedaRXJ

    Could you creat a fly ?

    It would be difficult to create a living thing with no living things around to study and understand.
  7. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    There's multiple species of ducks already that don't procreate, so no, it wouldn't. Ducks are not a species. They all descend from one species though.
  8. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    Did you miss the part where I said that most fish species cannot interbreed with or without human intervention?
  9. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    He's been doing the same thing to me. I addressed the same point about hybrids a week or so back, and he doesn't even acknowledge it. Whenever someone clears up a misconception or misunderstanding he has, he ignores it and repeats what he says. For example: l l l v
  10. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    It's not just the fact that many of them had feathers. It's that the bird-like features become more and more prominent the more recent in time you look. Showing a gradual trend of bird-like features over time suggests evolutionary development. Early feathers were more basic, downy, and less...
  11. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    Yep. These quotes don't go in depth enough. What the fossil record shows is lifeforms becoming more and more basic as you go back in time. These scientists that you're quoting need to show that this is not the case. I've said this repeatedly to you, that everything is just a variation of a...
  12. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    Umm... that's not what "being a negative" means. A negative is a claim that something isn't true. A positive is a claim that something is true. Evolution is a positive claim, as is creationism. You're asking for proof that things are NOT designed. You're asking for proof of a negative, but a...
  13. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    Like I said, I wouldn't assume the raindrop is anything special from the other raindrops. It hasn't been discovered. You're assuming it's special. That's what you're not getting.
  14. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    It's a good way to make something look like a fortunate accident, more-so than to make it feel special. If billions of raindrops fall from the sky, and one lands on a bullseye laying on the ground, I'd have a difficult time assuming that some grand being wanted that raindrop to feel special.
  15. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    No. It's a lack of one. There's no reason to assume physical laws have a law-giver until it's proven. You can't prove a negative. That doesn't answer why there's countless other lifeless planets out there. Saying he has to "iron out" something, suggests effort. Which suggests a lack of...
  16. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    That doesn't mean there should be a bajillion other useless planets out there. How about just make the the Moon, Sun and Earth with life on it, and make nothing else if he wants to make something special. Seriously? Having countless other lifeless planets out there is utterly redundant. It...
  17. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    How does that help your world view at all? Trillions of trillions of planets where only one has life, doesn't do service to the view of a grand design.
  18. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    The laws of physics, most likely. What deity only gives one planet life, and make all the other planets useless? The fact that it's the only planet we know of that has these conditions, suggests it happened by chance. If the universe were designed, I'd expect most, if not, all planets to...
  19. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    How, if you don't know what non-designed things look like? If Earth didn't have all those things, you'd still say it's designed since you think everything is designed. In other words, Mars with it's lifeless conditions, is designed according to you. Basically your argument is, if something...
  20. AndromedaRXJ

    Just Accidental?

    Then how can you say something looks designed if you don't know what a non-designed thing looks like?
Top