• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. AndromedaRXJ

    Required evidence for design?

    This video should give you an idea of what we might see if all life had a designer. If we had a non-omniscient creator that created life forms much like our technological development, then we shouldn't see life forms suggest much nested hierarchy. There should be animals that have both...
  2. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    Believing something to be false is still distinctly different, which is what my title implies. That something is false. Jesus christ, people. Why do you like arguing over stupid ****? It's annoying. Is there a grand point you're trying to debate that's tied into this, or is this really just...
  3. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    No, disbelief is saying something isn't true. Lack of belief is simply a lack of saying it is true. They're not the same thing.
  4. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    Disbelief and lack of belief aren't the same thing.
  5. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    I never believed in God. The difference now is, I disbelieve in God to a degree whereas before, I simply had a lack of belief.
  6. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    I haven't read that article in particular, but I've heard the idea of the Big Bang being a black hole before.
  7. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    It's because the universe has expanded since the time the light left. When the light left, the space between that point and Earth's future position was significantly less than 13.8 billion light years. But that space was expanding during the light's travel in such a way that it took 13.8 billion...
  8. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    This is false. The entire universe emitted the CMBR in every direction. So we suspect to find it everywhere. As explained before, the early universe was extremely dense and hot. The CMBR is the leftover heat. They weren't even microwaves at the time. They were gamma rays. I think the word...
  9. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    Well for one, the article says it's 500 million years younger than the universe, so the universe was already expanded significantly when it was 500 million years old. Second, galaxies do in fact occupy a specific position in space. So we still have to look in a specific direction to find it...
  10. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    Another way to reconcile energy conservation and the big bang is, the laws of physics possibly began at the big bang. Before that, there were no laws to break, including energy conservation laws. I'm not sure what you mean by "beyond the cosmic background radiation", but no, the Universe...
  11. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    It seems to be a valid site, but in the end, the evidence for the big bang strictly shows an early universe as extremely dense and hot, and as a singularity. Anything else is an assumption. As for why it had this state is unknown. Like I said, whether we choose to think it always existed as a...
  12. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    What formally taught version of the big bang describes energy as being created? Post a citation. There's nothing that I know of that explains the expansion. We just know that it happens.
  13. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    *Sigh* I know I've mentioned this plenty of times before, though I guess I've never mentioned it to you. Anyway, the Big Bang doesn't indicate a creation of energy. The Big Bang simply describes the early universe as extremely dense and hot, so spacetime was curved in on it self. Another...
  14. AndromedaRXJ

    What is creationism?

    Why say it's a "He" then? Why not call it a "She" from time to time? Like alternate between saying He and She.
  15. AndromedaRXJ

    God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!

    Meaning?
  16. AndromedaRXJ

    What is creationism?

    As said many time in this thread, there being a creator of the universe doesn't go against evolution. But from what I've learned in this thread, that would be called Deism, not Creationism.
  17. AndromedaRXJ

    I'm pretty sure there's no god now

    It's simple. Time it self is not an event that occupies a position in it self, nor is it an object flowing through it self. Rather than thinking of time flowing in some direction, think of things that exist as occupying some position in time. Viole is saying that spacetime doesn't exist in...
  18. AndromedaRXJ

    God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!

    Put it this way. At best, you're arguing that scientists are simply using the wrong word for Evolutionary Biology, and should use another word besides theory. But you can't argue that it isn't a fact. The evidence is too vast. At the very least, you're not gonna refute it by simply nitpicking...
  19. AndromedaRXJ

    Richard Dawkins had a stroke!

    Damn, that sucks. But at least it's only minor and not major.
  20. AndromedaRXJ

    What is creationism?

    None of that prevents macroevolution as that doesn't require hybridization. It's a moot point.
Top