• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. tumbleweed41

    If Obamacare is so great why......

    Has anyone here advocated that anyone with a job is entitled to a house? :shrug:
  2. tumbleweed41

    Texas wants to stop Democrats from Voting?

    I think we have all agreed that gerrymandering by either party is a political evil that should be removed from the system. You do agree, don't you?
  3. tumbleweed41

    If Obamacare is so great why......

    I agree. However, as I pointed out before, there are many jobs that do not pay a living wage that do not fall into the above categories. Are daycare worker charged with the care of your child as "low value"? How about a nursing aid? Security guard? Pharmacy assistant? Ambulance driver...
  4. tumbleweed41

    If Obamacare is so great why......

    If only more companies realized the value of the workers they depended on. So, you actually paid your workers a livable wage. I can appreciate that and applaud you for expecting a return on your investment in them. I am still wondering about what jobs you consider "low value" and unworthy of...
  5. tumbleweed41

    Texas wants to stop Democrats from Voting?

    Well said!
  6. tumbleweed41

    Texas wants to stop Democrats from Voting?

    From the Republican Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott; DOJ’s accusations of racial discrimination are baseless. In 2011, both houses of the Texas Legislature were controlled by large Republican majorities, and their redistricting decisions were designed to increase the Republican Party’s...
  7. tumbleweed41

    Just in: RNC votes to ban CNN and NBC from debates.

    Let's see. NBC (Not MSNBC) is doing a dramatic biography on it's entertainment network. Fox Entertainment is in talks to produce this dramatic biography. CNN is doing a documentary. No information is currently available on the scripts of content of either. The earliest projected airing date...
  8. tumbleweed41

    Just in: RNC votes to ban CNN and NBC from debates.

    Of course the RNC can do as it pleases. My question is, how will this affect the viewing of the GOP primaries and if Fox Entertainment wins the production of one of these biographies, should we expect the RNC to expand it's ban to FOX?
  9. tumbleweed41

    Can God print money?

    He could, but why? He already made gold... ;)
  10. tumbleweed41

    NSA Now In More Trouble

    Indeed. Perhaps they are still embarrassed by their complicity in passing the Patriot Act in the first place.
  11. tumbleweed41

    Just in: RNC votes to ban CNN and NBC from debates.

    FTR, Fox Entertainment is currently in talks to produce one of the biographies.
  12. tumbleweed41

    Just in: RNC votes to ban CNN and NBC from debates.

    Just saw on CNN that the RNC went ahead and voted to ban NBC and CNN from their debates based on proposed biographies to be aired by those networks on Hillary Clinton. What do you think of this action? Personally, I can see it coming back to bite them (RNC) in the ***.
  13. tumbleweed41

    The Instincts and Senses of M A N

    Does this have anything to do with Evolution v. Creationism?
  14. tumbleweed41

    If God created the universe, who created God?

    This argument only works as a question in a very basic cause/effect debate. Even then, one must assume that God is subject to physical laws, or in the case of Deism, is even able to interact with our universe. But, hey, welcome to the Forum anyway.
  15. tumbleweed41

    Why don't Theist's admit that there's no evidence for God?

    So, not only do you refuse to back up your claim, but you also fail to acknowledge that the claim is nothing more than an argumentum ad populum followed by circular reasoning and deflection. I think I have made my point.
  16. tumbleweed41

    Why don't Theist's admit that there's no evidence for God?

    OK Let's start with this; Go ahead, prove your argumentum ad populum.
  17. tumbleweed41

    Why don't Theist's admit that there's no evidence for God?

    Let's look at your original claim; Your argumentum ad populum claims that 'billions' have used the Gospels as a 'roadmap to experience God', thus making them true. When confronted with the equally invalid argument that the same could be said of the Qur'an, you attempt to use circular...
  18. tumbleweed41

    Why don't Theist's admit that there's no evidence for God?

    Apparently, your answer is, 'No, I cannot accept that.'. The irony being you cannot see your own hypocrisy.
  19. tumbleweed41

    So apparently religious people are dumber than atheists.

    I don't think atheists are necessarily "smarter" than theists. But I do believe that those who use objective reasoning are more likely to be atheists or weak theists.
  20. tumbleweed41

    Why don't Theist's admit that there's no evidence for God?

    By this logic, the Qur'an is equally valid. Can you accept that?
Top