OK, lets say God started life in the "primordial ooze", that God gave the spark of life to the first organism.
This still does not change the Theory of Evolution in explaining the facts of Biological Evolution.
Ah, so you are not speaking of Biological Evolution, you are speaking of Abiogenesis.
You may think they are the same, but that is like dismissing geology because we cannot see planets being formed NOW in our own solar system. You know, NOW!
Almost right.
The Theory of Evolution explains the observable facts of Biological Evolution.
All Scientific Theories are backed by falsifiable, repeatable, testable, observable and empirical evidence, Including the Theory of Evolution, Germ Theory, Atomic Theory, Circuit Theory, the Theory of...
I have an idea Shermana.
Read and critique the actual peer reviewed paper and quote from there anything you feel is a specific critique that accurately attacks what they say and back up the accusations with counter-evidence from actual peer reviewed studies.
I would like to see a more detailed critique myself.
Perhaps if they would submit their 'review' for actual peer review, we could get some professionals to do so.
As for the BIO-Complexity critique of 'There's Plenty of Time for Evolution', the most glaring flaw is that Demski et al. ignore the fact that selection can , and does, act on multiple alleles at the same time. Genes do not exist in isolation. Dawkins has presented this before, and Herbert...
First some clarification.
The article in question is a critical review, not a scientific paper.
The article was published in 'BIO-Complexity', an open access web journal by the Biologic Institute, whose stated goal is "to be the leading forum for testing the scientific merit of the claim that...
Yet I have no compulsion to commit suicide, despite my lack of faith.
Simply realizing this life is all I have gives value to living, no fear of punishment is needed.