• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. tumbleweed41

    Is Bill O'Reilly correct about the African-American culture and race?

    Or, if you blame social problems on a single race, you are racist or bigot, or both. It is a typical ploy to blame social ills on the "other". Throughout American history, those who wish to control the masses find a scapegoat to focus attention away from the real issues. Past scapegoats have...
  2. tumbleweed41

    americans ask....why muslim? what is your strength to believe God?

    There are many Americans who do not 'hate' Islam. But rather see Islam as another unnecessary belief in a world of observable natural wonders. (That would be the science part of the discussion)
  3. tumbleweed41

    Is the US a Christian nation?

    A Eurocentric view of history that ignores the participatory democracy that already existed at that time in what would become the US decades later.
  4. tumbleweed41

    I attained nirvana

    And I thought I was the only one... Welcome to RF!
  5. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    As I have said before, when Creationist present objective scientific evidence FOR Creationism, call me. http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/evolution-vs-creationism/88277-prove-creationism-id-here.html
  6. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    Yes, I went to the blog and read the entire thing. She is very good, as a lawyer, at twisting words. I prefer articles about biological evolution written by those who understand biological evolution. Like biologists. A simple and easy to understand source for the beginner is Berkley's...
  7. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    EvolutionNews.org, is a blog from The Discovery Institute where Behe is a Senior Fellow. And the author of the above mentioned blog? A biologist? A biochemist? No? It's attorney Casey Luskin, Program Officer in Public Policy & Legal Affairs for the Discovery Institute.
  8. tumbleweed41

    Neil deGrasse Tyson to Revive "Cosmos"

    Very exited!!!!!
  9. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    Behe in ‘Edge of Evolution’ That is, unless you are ignorant or misrepresenting HIV and Vpu, Courtesy of Ian Musgrave PhD, Professor of molecular pharmacology/toxicology, University of Adelaide
  10. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    Yes, I do. For instance, in another thread, misinformation was presented from Behe concerning HIV and mutation rates. And judging from what Behe said, he is either ignorant of of Vpu, or misrepresenting HIV (lying).
  11. tumbleweed41

    Why do Evolutionists not like to actually debate Evolution and rely on personal attacks?

    The problem is, there is no real debate. And until the highly improbable time when Creationists can provide objective empirical scientific evidence FOR creationism, there will continue to be no real debate.
  12. tumbleweed41

    Evidence Macroevolution Does Not Exist

    Although, I do have to admit, the diagram is particularly Eurocentric and lacks many of the recent discoveries in the development of modern humans.:D
  13. tumbleweed41

    Evidence Macroevolution Does Not Exist

    Biologist would disagree with you. But what do they know.:rolleyes:
  14. tumbleweed41

    Should Feminists be encouraging women to be strippers?

    I think we need to go see one of the local burlesque troops shows soon.;)
  15. tumbleweed41

    Evidence Macroevolution Does Not Exist

    When I constantly hear Creationists bemoan that they will accept biological evolution when a dog has a cat (or one species give birth to a different species), it is obvious that they do not understand the definition of macroevolution.
  16. tumbleweed41

    Evidence Macroevolution Does Not Exist

    I think Iti meant no Macro-evolution in the sense many Creationists think of it.
Top