• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    I agree its very complicated. So much so that it can't happen by accident. I doubt no matter how many times i trip and drop my paint tray it wont result in the Mona Lisa on my floor ;)
  2. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Im sorry but the bones of wings are light and delicate with a different joint structure to support wing movement. Then you add in the feathers, and the overall change in body composition since now the species walks on 2 legs instead of 4. Are you with me so far?? And you credit all this to a...
  3. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    No mutations created in laboratories don't stick. Left alone nature corrects the mutation. The Hox gene acts as a circuit breaker, turning on or off existing genes. It doesn't create anything that wasn't already there. Dogs are a great example as too how far you can push variations but their...
  4. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Russell didn't make a claim reguarding evolution. I was simply making a point that much of what Russell has put forth can be tested in a way to provide as much evidence as we have to establish evolution as fact. The statement was in response to gnosics comment of irrefutable proof needed in...
  5. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    No i'm sorry...gene information doesn't work that way and what you are describing is a mutation. There are tens of decades of research in mutations from plants to fruit flies etc... Mutations aren't beneficial and can only be maintained by man in a controlled environment. When man stops...
  6. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    You continue to belittle Russells scientific achievements. His 1926 copyrighted periodic table predicted the existence of deuterium and tritium as well as all transuranium elements such as plutonium and neptunium. 1927 He transmuted water into 17 different substances. 1958-61 worked with Norad...
  7. Walter Russell

    Wonder??? Why my J.W. friends left this site?

    I once had a neighbor friend that was a JW. Real cool guy and we had many religious conversations. The one point I always tried to make with him was that if he truly believed he had the truth, it would withstand any test of opposing views and he shouldn't be afraid to test his belief sgainst...
  8. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Reguardless, no genetic info for wings means no wings. Simple as that.
  9. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Veritable limited changes "adaptation" I have no issue with. The is all together different than information itself. Nothing that crawled out of the ocean grow legs with the genetic information to build them in the first place. No creature took to the skies without already having the information...
  10. Walter Russell

    Why does it seem that God never intervenes in Human Suffering

    These sufferings are created by man due to his imbalance and will be required to become balanced to end them. God isn't going to do that for us. The quicker we realize that the better off we'll be.
  11. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    I would consider this adaptation rather evolution. Having trbl with my phone to quote multiples I'm sorry to burst your bubble but science has not and cannot prove where information comes from with considering "mind" as an outside source. Physical matter as you like to call it does not create...
  12. Walter Russell

    God decides to create and...

    God divided his light into 2 equal and opposite light conditions. One to generate, the other to radiate. They're 2 halves of one. These 2 conditions continuously give of themselves to each other to remain in balance. Neither could exist without the other. Sin comes from sine, it represents...
  13. Walter Russell

    God decides to create and...

    God created a perfectly polarized 2 way universe of interchange. Its our lack of understanding thats imperfect
  14. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    I didn't say "proof", I said "evidence". There is much consensus in the scientific community for many things that lack irrefutable proof that is put forward as "fact", simply because science discovers a way something "may" have happened. Evolution being a great example. The purpose in my...
  15. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Im not telling you to believe in anything. I would like to ask if you believe in evolution?
  16. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    We will just have to agree to disagree... The universe has a mathematical formula. That is evidence enough for me. It doesn't mean the creator has to be a personal one but creation isn't random. Its intelligently designed. I think anyone that refuses to see that is ignoring science not...
  17. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    I respect your opinion. I find it a scientific way to explain creation by an intelligent creator with the only law being the natural law of balance which he very clearly explains in the sexed two way universe. The perfect marriage of religion and science based on truth not faith and is all...
  18. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Just to add another comment about Russell. His understanding of the Universe in his mind wasn't theoretical. It was a knowing. He went to great lengths to share what he knew with the rest of the world in a way that could be tested for accuracy and be used for the betterment of all. He was a...
  19. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    Yes, a much better response, thank you ;) Below is a link for the pdf copy of Russells book "A New Concept of the Universe" Certainly his life time wasn't long enough to work out all of his theories but many in my op could have by know had main stream science attempted to. However I would add...
  20. Walter Russell

    Which existed first "something" or "nothing"?

    WWll era scientist didn't take Russells periodic table as speculation when they used it to create the atomic bomb... Nikola Tesla certainly didn't see Russells work and knowledge as speculation, but i'm sure your knowledge exceeds theirs considering that brillant one liner...
Top