• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    Go ahead. The burden of proof is on you after all. I'm glad you're starting to realize this. And whether the Universe is eternal or not, the Big Bang still happened.
  2. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    Saying that something "simply makes more sense" isn't a logical argument.
  3. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    You can't prove any physical fact with logic alone. You need physical evidence. And you can't argue something is true due to a lack of proof against it.
  4. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    Show me the proof that there's not an invisible dragon-fairy on the Moon making chocolate cake out of paper clips and cotton balls. If you can't show the prove that there isn't one, then that means there assurably is one.
  5. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    You took that out of context. He means in the context of evolutionary biology. "Kind" isn't a formal term used for any given group of lifeforms.
  6. AndromedaRXJ

    Could Nothingness Be Another Dimension In And Of Itself?

    And math too. I would consider math a science, it's just not a natural science.
  7. AndromedaRXJ

    Could Nothingness Be Another Dimension In And Of Itself?

    The day mysticism it self solves any scientific problem would be the day mysticism would be deemed a method of science. And it probably wouldn't be called mysticism anymore either. Anything that we can come to know and understand, is automatically demystified (if it were mystified to begin...
  8. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    By extension, wouldn't that mean any isolated system has zero energy?
  9. AndromedaRXJ

    lol, you're welcome.

    lol, you're welcome.
  10. AndromedaRXJ

    God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!

    No, a hypothesis is an explanation that's not proven. A theory is an explanation that's much more substantiated or proven. A law is not an explanation, but a fundamental description of nature that's well substantiated or proven. Ask yourself, if a theory is what you say it is, why would the...
  11. AndromedaRXJ

    God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!

    A law in science is a statement or equation that describes some aspect of the Universe. A theory explains some aspect of the Universe. They are simply two different things. It has nothing to do with which is more true. Laws describe. Theories explain. Remember that.
  12. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    How did the energy get where? Where else would it be? Again, the Big Bang describes the early universe as extremely dense. How did it become dense? Who knows. But not being able to answer this doesn't put any holes in the Big Bang Theory or Energy Conservation.
  13. AndromedaRXJ

    God Recreated the Earth 6,000 Years Ago!

    A theory in science is an explanation with a strong basis, predictive power, and applicable usefulness. A proven theory is still a theory, as it still remains being an explanation with predictive power and application. What will stop Evolution from being a theory is disproving it, not proving it.
  14. AndromedaRXJ

    No Lions and Tigers were on Noah’s Ark

    Not only that, but Koalas will only eat eucalyptus leaves off of the tree. If you pick the leaves off the tree and try to feed it to the koala, it won't even recognize it as eucalyptus leaves and won't attempt to eat it.
  15. AndromedaRXJ

    The contributions of the sciences to Religion

    I'm not making claims on what you do and don't know. I'm claiming that your process of arriving at conclusions is flawed.
  16. AndromedaRXJ

    The contributions of the sciences to Religion

    Empty rhetoric. Anybody could substitute whatever terms they want to and make an equally useless claim. Would you like me to show you?
  17. AndromedaRXJ

    Can you give me an observable evidence that Evolution is true?

    The Big Bang simply describes an extremely dense early Universe where spacetime was curved in on itself, that then rapidly expanded. There's no issues with energy conservation.
  18. AndromedaRXJ

    The contributions of the sciences to Religion

    I never mentioned once that I was a materialist. Furthermore, I never said telepathic doesn't exist (nor did I say it does either). What I am saying is your rationale to conclude that it does exist is flawed (thinking of people who call you moments later), because you rule out all other...
  19. AndromedaRXJ

    What is creationism?

    If this is the God of the Bible we're talking about, I wouldn't call him benevolent. This is a supposed deity who has no problem sending people to eternal torture. Who's to say he wouldn't get a kick out of watching/controlling the very wasteful, amoral, inefficient, and harsh process of...
  20. AndromedaRXJ

    The contributions of the sciences to Religion

    You're trying to label me yourself without me actually disclosing what I am. Confirmation bias. What belief of mine do you speak of exactly? Let's hear your unfounded assumptions about me. I'm not the one trying to confirm anything. You are. You're concluding that thinking about someone and...
Top