That's very bold of you when you consider how many misconceptions there are about schizophrenia. I have friends who are psychotic and they're awesome people. (might as well mention that I also have general anxiety and OCD but find that more bothersome and I don't really like to talk about it as...
I have Asperger's specifically, which is no longer diagnosed separately from autism in general. I always tended to call myself an "autistic person", anyways - "person with Asperger's" is too medical, "Aspie" is too cutesy and I like showing solidarity with people elsewhere on the spectrum. Some...
Networks of self-sufficient communes. Food would be produced locally thru permaculturally methods - there would be no factory farming or monocrop agriculture. Transportation that uses fossil fuels would be phased out and eventually eliminated. Expect more dirt and brick roads, more bicycles and...
I was gonna start an interview thread about anarchism, since I'm an anarchist and it's not very well-understood.
Or I was gonna start an interview thread about autism, since I'm autistic and it's not very well understood.
Or I was gonna start an interview thread about synesthesia, since I'm a...
Aren't there multiple views on the issue in Hellenic and Roman antiquity? Like, Aristotle believed in a prime mover, but the oldest narratives start with the primordial chaos.
protip for the misinformed: disgust is an aesthetic judgment, not an ethical judgment. Personally, I find soggy food disgusting. Doesn't make it evil or "unnatural" or whatever.
Not all opinions are equally valid. "The world is flat" is an opinion. "All other races are inferior" is an opinion.
Are you trying to state an aesthetic preference, or make a factual claim? Those are two very different things.
I don't see how that any of that would make him a jerk, tho. Character-wise he seems like a really honest, forthright dude without much hostility towards anybody.
Philosophical absurdism is not the same thing as something being "absurd" in the colloquial sense. Believing the world to be absurd (i.e. random, without inherent meaning) is not the same thing as supporting an absurd (i.e. silly, irrational) worldview. You're playing word games here.
Full oneness would be Advaita or a similar nondualist pantheism. idk if I believe in that, tho I find the concept very intriguing. My worldview is more focused on pluralism than oneness, but there is a certain oneness in that I believe that matter and spirit are basically a spectrum as opposed...
Is that by total numbers, or per capita? As a mostly gay pansexual/bi dude, it seems kinda counter-intuitive to do that with a cis woman. But that's just my personal opinion; sexual desire is very subjective.
No, the prostate is very explicitly a sexual organ which is essential to male orgasm and is linked to the penis etc. And it doesn't even get that stimulated from pooping, I'm pretty sure. If that was the point I don't know why it would specifically be present in one biological sex and why it can...