I'm not sure "the gospels say" is the same thing as saying "it's in the gospels" or that "gospels", a plural noun, is the same as "Bible", a singular noun, for comparison/analogy purposes. I'll have to give it some deep cognitivetorical (if it's not already in the dictionary, it should be) thought.
Probably not. I was just trying to keep you honest with regard to your use of the plural.
Agree. Again, just trying to keep you honest with regard to your declarative phrase that the gospels say that it was John at the crucifixion when they merely say that it was the disciple whom Jesus loved.
From your post #430 - You quoted 1 Corinthians 15:4 and said: "There isn't anything that relates to the crucifixion." If you weren't referring to that verse, to what were you referring?
You quoted Shiranui117's comment about 1 Corinthians 15:4 and replied that "There isn't anything that relates to the crucifixion." If you weren't referring to that verse, to what were you referring?
Also, there is nothing there which shows an example where a daytime and a night time were forecast or said to be involved with an event when no part of a daytime or no part of a night time could be.
And remember, this topic is directed to those who believe the crucifixion took place on the 6th...
So your answer is yes; then how about right now, while you are reading this, demonstrate your stated ability to become an atheist in a heartbeat, by engendering the belief that supreme beings do not exist. Now that you believe that they don't, how did you do it?