Ape-men fossils are either ape fossils or outright fakes. None of them are intact and complete skeletons found lying on their side and encased in rock as one complete unit. They are separate bones - found either within the vicinity of each other or, at worst case, collected from miles apart...
Its been over 3 months and still no analysis from so many secularists and atheists who put their faith in whatever scientists say about our supposed relationship to chimps.
Has no others even read the study?
A month ago, I asked this question about the study:
Question #1: What was the total...
So many secularists believe what scientists say but won't say WHY they believe.
Here is the one word explanation: faith.
Hebrews 11: "Now faith is confidence in what we hope for and assurance about what we do not see."
Its been way over a month and still no analysis from so many secularists who put their faith in whatever scientists say about our supposed relationship to chimps.
Has no others even read the study?
Here's a question I would like the answer to (assuming those who put their faith in studies like...
God exists but why or how, I don't know. But the question about why or how God exists is only a diversion.
I don't need to know why God exists in order to know God does indeed exist.
How do I know God exists? Because all information requires a thought process. This is the same scientific...
I assume the above statement shows a belief in abiogenesis where nonliving chemicals and materials became a living cell or entity. This is a violation of a basic principle of biology: Nonliving matter will not become living material.
Has anyone here seen or heard of nonliving matter becoming...
Its been more than one month now and we are still waiting for more secularists to present their analysis of the chimp genome study. So far only a few have done so.
The rest of you have made many comments, which is fine, but NO ANALYSIS.
WHERE IS YOUR ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY?
Does this mean...
Why does everything and everyone that exists HAVE TO:
1) Have a reason to exist?
2) Have to evolve?
There is no cosmic rule which says God has to have a reason to exist, is there? I'm not aware of any such rule or principle.
Besides, I am simply arguing that there is sufficient evidence for...
1) We have NEVER observed matter materializing from nothing, especially very large objects like planets. To refer us to a theory or 'uncertainty principle' is so very weak at best, and a rabbit trail at worst.
2) A measurable fluctuation of energy at the minutest atomic level does NOT get us...
So is this an admission that you believe because a group of them said so?
Of course its not a conspiracy. Ridiculous to even think it is. I am not a conspiracy type anyway. And it doesn't need to be a conspiracy in order for a group of scientists to be wrong, now does it?
Did Jesus mention...
It's been 3 weeks now and nobody else is coming forward with their own analysis of the chimp DNA article.
Lots of comments and opinions, No analysis. Zip. Nada.
Many people believe the study but few have analyzed it on their own. What does this mean?
I think this means just one word...
True. Proving evolution wrong does not get us to Jesus. But proving a half-baked fallacy wrong is a fools errand.
But back to the question:
If you did not perform your own analysis of the chimp DNA article, how did you come to believe it?
Is it because a bunch of scientists told you to...
Do you believe the scientists (quoted in the original post) - that everything came from nothing?
If so, why?
Is it because a group of scientists said it? Details please.
Has anyone here ever seen any sort of information such as a set of instructions - form on their own? Not !
In the movie "Contact', scientists immediately knew they had contacted intelligent life because....a set of instructions were sent to them.
Why? Because a set of instructions reveals a...
IMHO, here is why some atheists will believe almost anything scientists claim:
1) A scientist is highly educated, so he must be on to something.
2) If a group of scientists agree, so much the better (a popular vote among scientists hold a lot of weight).
3) Some (not all) atheists are biased...
For your sake I wish it were a strawman. Really I do.
But here it is folks - SCIENTISTS - telling us to believe that EVERYTHING came from nothing!
Those quotes above are PROOF that not just one scientist, but MANY scientists can be completely wrong. No straw man here. Only an empty claim...
The laws of physics tell us: Matter cannot be created (nor can it create itself).
Question: Has anyone ever seen something come from nothing? If you have, your eyes are lying to you.
Question: Do you believe something can come from nothing? If you do, you are lying to yourself.
This...
So, other than the few of us who have already given our analysis of the Chimp/Human DNA article, no one else has done so.
I can only conclude the rest of you have placed your faith on one side or the other WITHOUT reading the article.
So many believe the Bible without reading it and so many...
So you believe what others say without an understanding of your own. I get it. Many of us operate in a similar manner.
Here is what I suspect. Most people believe and /or accept the theory of evolution or big bang theories as fact, based on:
1) Whether a scientist said it (aka. the...
The problem is that many times, we NEVER hear the word "guess" even though it is exactly that. How many times have we been presented with a "guess" in a "fact-like" manner?
If you have spent any time researching the subject of origins, you have undoubtedly been presented with scientific...