Science is not worthless
and 2) has to do with certian laws in physic that eliminate chance as a source for life which implys choice (in this case The choices of a creator as resembled by the choices of an artist or a Builder
Things against evolution:
1) the simple cell theory. If the first cell could not have come together by chance then life could not have start by chance. The simple cell in Darwins day was thought of as a jelly like substance. BUt in mordern times we now know that the simplist cells are...
I do not have much time but I would like to say a few things and maybe latter I can expound. There are two ways for the Creationist:
1) Refute evotion buy destroying its pillors In which if proven the whole system will fail.
2) Reveiw certian truths in science that can most probably com from a...
I'm not super smart but I have done my research on both sides (since I went to public school) and read various books buy Creationist and Evolutionist who by their own research have lead them to believe that life could not have arisen by chance. They refer usually to the complexity in life and...
As I did A quick scan I didn't see much in responce to the original Question of why creationist can believe this. I saw alot of philosophical reasons to believe but not actual scientific reasons behind the theory.