• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    There's no reason for one to regard the universe to be an illusion.Except your theoretical steps,there is literally no way to discard the whole universe as an illusion!!! Its really hard to regard a thing(universe),which is present today ,to be absent tomorrow. It might be or it might not,but...
  2. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    You can deem the people you dreamt to be unreal,only when you accept the reality of dream. How does it make sense if dream itself is unreal???will this unreal dream trigger another unreal dream???Whats the reason for this unreal dream?? 1. Just because they appear and vanish you cannot...
  3. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    The highest form of reality that you guys suppose is still an experience ,i.e the exp of satchitananda.My question stands against your acceptence of reality of satchitananda exp and unreality of worldly exp!!!
  4. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    If it was only one ,then why are we experiencing samsaara?????Why is there need for false reality,i.e illusion????
  5. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    This really doesn't make any sense,the fact that someone exists is always true,it cannot be sometimes true and sometimes false!!!!!!!!If this someone dies,then the fact that he is dead is as true as the fact that he existed before his death.....
  6. B

    The Validity of Advaita

    I accept your stand on scientists, but its hard to differentiate these foolish scientists stand and advaita's stand. Scientists don't accept any creator for the creation i.e universe, advaiti's are the same too,they accept that everything other than brahman as unreal,so where is the difference...
  7. B

    Eka Jiva Vada

    The ornaments made of gold are gold themselves,there cannot be gold without the actual gold property possessed by the ornament.Even the ornaments are gold,and these ornaments and the attributes possessed by it are as real as the existence of gold itself.Can you please care to explain as to why...
  8. B

    Eka Jiva Vada

    How do you confirm this vyavaharika level??? Sat is always sat ,it cannot become asat. Why is brahman sat in both vyavaharika and paramarthika level?? In vyavaharika level ,everything is unreal,and hence vyavaharikatva is itself not yet confirmed!!! "I threw a rock" Here rock is sat i am...
  9. B

    Ishvara and mAyA

    Then you are accepting that brahman has attributes!!!!
  10. B

    Ishvara and mAyA

    Maya cannot be the effect of ignorance.Because,the effect of ignorance cannot be present without the actual ignorance in the ignorant.If you conclude maya as the effect of ignorance,then where is this ignorance present?? What is the reason for this ignorance???Is it previous ignorance ??? If...
  11. B

    Eka Jiva Vada

    Then you are accepting maya as sat!!!!!!which is opposed to advaita!!
  12. B

    Ishvara and mAyA

    This can never be possible,maya cannot merge with brahman,when given that maya is unreal and avachya.It is unreal and it cannot have any affect on brahman,and similarly it merging with brahman ,must be unreal.If you accept the process of merging then,maya must be held as a real entity. Unreal...
  13. B

    Eka Jiva Vada

    Then how can one say that world comes under maya which is anirvachya??
  14. B

    Ishvara and mAyA

    You are contradicting yourself. If maya is false knowledge then which is the right one???? Obviously the right one must be the knowledge of brahman.But according to advaita, only brahman is real, getting the knowledge of brahman must also come under maya. Both false knowledge and the true...
  15. B

    Eka Jiva Vada

    When one dies his perception of the world dies with him to.Does this mean the non-existence of the world. Or is the non-existence of the world applicable to the dead person only. Either of the options doesn't give the correct answer. I can't see north pole from here this statement (doesn't...
  16. B

    Ishvara and mAyA

    At least we can define shadow and we know that it is real.But can we do the same to define an object which is itself undefinable?????????????????(maya).If brahman is accepted to be a real entity,then his shadow must also be a real one!!!!!!!! I think this shadow scenario doesn't suit the...
  17. B

    "Mukti" according to three schools of vedanta.

    but this fact forces us to view god as a low living one. If one assumes the whole unverse to be parts of god then , the instant the universe is destroyed is the instant when god will be no more. Your point is more like saying that god is a mortal..........
  18. B

    "Mukti" according to three schools of vedanta.

    because he is god.Positive and negative emotion doesn't come here. Mukti means just knowing god .
  19. B

    "Mukti" according to three schools of vedanta.

    I have doubt's regarding mukti and the importance given to it by 3 schools of vedanta. Dvaita holds its theory of mukti , as it consider's the world to be real , all souls strive to gain mukti.There is no escape here, as there is in advaita . One has to strive to gain mukti. But how can one...
  20. B

    Salvation and Moksha.

Top