Careful referring to broad variable philosophical concepts like ontology and metaphysics to justify your 'might be unknown,; because these philosophies in some versions do not reject that our physical existence as natural, but speculate on the underlying causes and relationships of our natural...
Yes, in physics and cosmology yes, nothing refers to the zero energy state of the smallest scale of the Quantum world.
As far as in philosophy/theology that concept of absolute nothing is absolute nothing.
Not atheists nor other scientists. This accusation is old and moldy and reflects an intentional ignorance of physics and cosmology. This false claim has been addressed many times
Scientists and atheists do not believe anything comes from nothing.
It is acknowledged that from your "personal" comfortable and convenient perspective this is the case,
Beyond this it does not work nor have any relevance to science and reality.
Archaeological evidence:
https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/ancient-cultures/daily-life-and-practice/judean-pillar-figurines/
Judean Pillar Figurines
Puzzling artifacts from Iron Age Judah
Robin Ngo January 05, 2016 19 Comments 16723 views Share
First discovered more than one hundred...
Objective observable fact versus of the mind only.
Your questions and assertions are confusing, vague, obtuse, and incoherent, Your reference of a Danish book has absolutely nothing to do with your argument. It is a well accepted non controversial academic reference that deals with the...
You apparently lack the basics of the English language"
https://www.dictionary.com/e/subjective-vs-objective/
Subjective most commonly means based on the personal perspective or preferences of a person—the subject who’s observing something. In contrast, objective most commonly means not...
Your questions and assertions are confusing, vague, obtuse, and incoherent, Your reference of a Danish book has absolutely nothing to do with your argument. It is a well accepted non controversial academic reference that deals with the philosophy and teaching of Social Science at the college...
In all cultures in the world there are archaic and ancient beliefs and practices that do not meet the standards of Modern Methodological Naturalism. In the major universities and among academic scientists high academic standards dominate. There are ancient practices in medicine and health that...
Not my standard. Itis the International Standard of Methodological Naturalism. The problem is your standard for the comfort and convenience of what you believe.
Objective verifiable and predictable evidence of the nature of our physical existence is relevant to science.
Subjective claims and...
IF the 'Source' exists that some call and define as God(s), and with the demands of the "must" meet certain criteria and questions is a contradiction of would be the nature of the 'Source' that cannot be described from the human perspective. The same problem exists from the perspective. of the...
This somewhat adds more to what your view is. I do not believe you can make this distinction in what is the knowledge of science for your comfort and convenience,
Not meaningful. The universe simply exists regardless of our human awareness of it. It is more likely that the universe is...