• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. DavidFirth

    The last post is the WINNER!

    Well, yeah. Just dropped in for the win.
  2. DavidFirth

    The last post is the WINNER!

    Or rather... last
  3. DavidFirth

    The last post is the WINNER!

    First now
  4. DavidFirth

    Insult The Poster Before You!

    Became a politician, i.e. professional liar
  5. DavidFirth

    The last post is the WINNER!

    Firth is back for the win
  6. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    I know enough about their evidence to know they cannot prove what they say. And yes, they do have faith. Definition of FAITH See 2b(1) and 3.
  7. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    It's a classification. That's all it is.
  8. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    It's painfully obvious that the Creator is necessary. It's obvious He created.
  9. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    Still with the proof thing? Scientists don't require or care about proof, which is seldom possible. Good to see you've realized scientists have faith, too. It's to bad they put their faith in each other's guessing games.
  10. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    Scientists are the problem, not science itself. How one interprets evidence has everything to do with their own personal bias and preferences. Scientists cannot prove abiogenesis, big bang theory, macro-evolution or any of the many, many assumptions used in the "truth" of such theories that...
  11. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    That's just classification preference and it proves nothing but scientists' willing ignorance of the obvious.
  12. DavidFirth

    My Issues With Romans One

    True, but we were discussing atheists in particular.
  13. DavidFirth

    My Issues With Romans One

    Yes, that's what I said.
  14. DavidFirth

    Insult The Poster Before You!

    Stains his pants
  15. DavidFirth

    The last post is the WINNER!

    You can cry peacefully because I just won!
  16. DavidFirth

    The Random, Meaningless Announcements Thread 3!

    @Revoltingest has been banned from Revoltistan because he's too revolting.
  17. DavidFirth

    My Issues With Romans One

    Atheists fit into verses 17 & 18, not 16.
  18. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    I have looked into it. Abiogenesis is just about as stupid a theory as spontaneous generation was. Even if scientists managed to create some resemblance of a life form in a lab it would not prove abiogenesis. But why prove it when they can get intelligent people to believe it, anyway?
  19. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    Actually, you're both wrong. Im no ape.
  20. DavidFirth

    A Question for Creationists

    That's a fact, not just a scientific denial. Scientists are busy now trying to determine exactly how that happened a few billion years ago. Scientists need to get busy on feeding everybody, curing cancer, AIDS and researching things that really matter.
Top