• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. mikkel_the_dane

    Where should the "I don't know" go?

    Yeah, I am speaking about epistemology. You are speaking about religion. To me knowledge is broader than just religion. And yes, I am an atheist and not religious.
  2. mikkel_the_dane

    Where should the "I don't know" go?

    Yeah, and it might mean differently when I use it. And for trouble, only some of that is objective in regards to objective reality.
  3. mikkel_the_dane

    Where should the "I don't know" go?

    Well, I start with how do I know that I know. And as a skeptic, I end with that I don't know in the objective sense. So it is to me, not really about God, but what it means to say I know...
  4. mikkel_the_dane

    Where should the "I don't know" go?

    The problem is that it only works on the common or if you like objective. The moment it in effect becomes individual and subjective for how to live as a human, your examples which are all objective have no relevance for the individual and subjective. Further your hidden subjective individual...
  5. mikkel_the_dane

    Where should the "I don't know" go?

    In general and not just for religion, no question is more reasonable than another other. There is even no we as such, because to assume that also requires a reason. If you want to play strong skepticism then it ends in what works for you as for your subjective reasoning.
  6. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    Yeah, just give evidence for where the Overton window is now and how it has moved since say at least year 2000.
  7. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    Well, 2 million out of 260 adult Americans is widely held, is that it???
  8. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    But that was not the claim. The claim was when did the meaning of the word come around.
  9. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    Yeah, there is more to the world than you.
  10. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    What is that supposed to mean? Can you expand on that?
  11. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    Yeah, 1, 2, a lot of people. Then what??? Let us say that 2 million people believe in it. So what??? Do they only live their lives for that and vote for that? Can you not understand that those 2 million only matter if they are organized and actually vote based on being woke. Then you must show...
  12. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    No, I am granting you that there are 2 or more woke people. And then I ask, then what? What follows from that with logic and evidence?
  13. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    But that is empty, because nothing follows from that other than X amount hold certain beliefs. That is all. I didn't say a lot BTW. I said X amount. If you want to use logic and evidence, do so and admit I didn't grant you that a lot of people believe so. I granted X amount.
  14. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    Okay, here is a debate technique. Grant a point. I grant you that X amount of people hold the potions as per woke as listed by you. Now what is next as with logic and evidence from that? Remember evidence as - the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition...
  15. mikkel_the_dane

    What is "woke" in 2024

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/wordplay/woke-meaning-origin
  16. mikkel_the_dane

    When And How?

    Well, as a skeptic it is unknown to me, how the universe is in the objective sense of being in itself, so I don't know if it started or not, has always been here or not or any other version of how it is as such.
  17. mikkel_the_dane

    Her name was Amber Nicole Thurman ...

    Well, I doubt that is the actual scientific explanation.
  18. mikkel_the_dane

    Her name was Amber Nicole Thurman ...

    Yeah, irrelevant to the case as per the OP and further the pill is not 100% effective.
  19. mikkel_the_dane

    Her name was Amber Nicole Thurman ...

    Well, neither position is with objective truth/proof/evidence and for opinion as this - a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge - it is not based on fact or knowledge. Just because something is legal doesn't make it a fact.
  20. mikkel_the_dane

    Her name was Amber Nicole Thurman ...

    Can a minor file a report without parental approval?
Top