I used to think the Dillahunty and Dawkins type arguments against the existence of God were valid, and I suppose they are, as long as God means little more to you than the cartoonish papier mache God of mainstream religion. I take a more nuanced God-as-consciousness approach to the problem of...
Yes, that is all common sense. The fact that we need to remind people of that simply highlights how out of touch with reality we've allowed ourselves to become.
Does anyone honestly think that Hamas debates their own moral approach to this war with the same scrutiny that we are doing here? The idea that Hamas would debate amongst themselves how best to mitigate Jewish civilian casualties is incomprehensible.
Further, what do you think would happen if...
I didn't expect you to come out and admit that you're in favor of outright fascism, but there it is.
Honesty is a powerful bridge of communication, but people don't necessarily arrive at the same conclusions just because they're being honest. Further, it would be of great harm if honest...
Well, we can't just have people believing whatever they want, now, can we? :rolleyes:
Much of what humans regard as "truth" is simply consensus or belief, and not ACTUAL truth. Again, the problem is determination of what is true and what is not. Just take scientific endeavor for instance. If...
Let's get something straight: regulating information is de facto censorship.
And then the white elephant. What happens when big daddy disagrees with your view of reality? Or do you assume that you're going to agree with whatever the government's curated narrative is? I have news for you...if...
Ah...so the government will only be regulating the behavior of those with vast sums of money. Gotcha.
For the record, ten million dollars really isn't as much as it sounds. And in ten years, inflation will make that sum even more applicable to the smaller tier producers.
Bro, you're the only one that brought up "censorship", not me.
Though I will say that if you do not see this as encroachment on free speech, I would say you're not thinking clearly. ---> "...protect consumers and include broadcaster codes of conduct and mechanisms for complaints."
In any...
You are aware that mandatory information reporting is a form of regulation, right?
Are you further aware that the article cites the Canadian government official website, canada.ca, and the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), crtc.gc.ca, as its primary sources...
I see Canada's big daddy government is coming along nicely.
Certainly this will help ensure safety and security for all. :unamused:
https://thecountersignal.com/trudeau-government-moves-to-regulate-podcasts/
Anecdotal evidence is enough to know that it does happen. With what frequency, I don't have the answer to that question.
100%
I'm extremely skeptical that those results are because lesbians just make better parents. If the study is not controlled for things like socioeconomic status, then the...
No, it is not all subjective. Some of it is objective.
Monogamy has protective benefits. Practicing monogamy provides inherent protection from paternal ambiguity and transmission of STIs. Those are objective benefits.
I'm sorry, I did not realize that had happened. I've edited the post.
I think it's important for biological fathers to adopt that responsibility. If the child's real father is not in their life, they can become emotionally burdened with that rejection.
Well, I'm sure we can at least agree that honesty, trust, and staying true to the mutual expectations of the relationship are paramount to the health of a relationship, regardless of whether it's monogamous or poly.
Because raising children is a lifetime of physical and emotional responsibility and monetary expense. I would feel repulsion at the thought. And extreme anger if I was put in that position due to manipulation or dishonesty on the part of my partner.