• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

fermat last theorem

  1. questfortruth

    Weakness of God's proofs, and incompleteness theorem

    INTRODUCTION Colin McLarty, ``What does it take to prove Fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory,'' Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16(3), 359-377 (2010). MY CONTRIBUTION \begin{abstract} I argue, that a good paper with good proof can contain weak spots. So the...
    • questfortruth
    • Thread
    • fermat last theorem proof for god proof of god religion and science science and the bible theism
    • Replies: 44
    • Forum: Science and Religion
  2. questfortruth

    Is this a consequence of Fermat's Last Theorem new?

    I have not proven by myself the Fermat's Last Theorem, but have taken the Prof. Wiles proof, that a^n+b^n=c^n, n>2, has no solution in positive integers a,b, and c, I have derived several true consequences, as an example: that expression x^9+y^6=z^3 can not have a solution in positive integers...
  3. questfortruth

    Fermat Last Theorem and Riemann Hypothesis theological proof

    The humankind is not yet done with Fermat's Last Theorem: Colin McLarty, ``What does it take to prove Fermat's last theorem? Grothendieck and the logic of number theory,'' Bulletin of Symbolic Logic {\bf 16}(3), 359--377 (2010). It is not yet rigorously proven! According to the definition of...
  4. questfortruth

    11 page solution to Fermat Last Theorem and Dark Matter

    The following was copyrighted at notar: Energy-Momentum is not Defined Globally, But Locally, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:1907.0398 You can always find a violation of the Logic of Aristotle in any hazy text. In any. No one found that in my text.
Top