In the thread "Damn Atheists!!", Nimos presented very interesting questions to atheists. While I'm not an atheist, I think they don't pose any problem to atheists.
That's a trap. If the non-theist replies it does, then the religious apologist can simply ask: can science prove (or explain...
When asked for the reasons why people believe in God, Intelligent Design proponents say a major one is the fact that the universe has order. This order, according to them, clearly, undeniably and inescapably shows that an intelligent designer was responsible for fashioning the natural world...
When atheists and religious apologists start discussing arguments for the existence of God, the fine-tuning argument usually comes up (this argument very basically says that the set of constants that allow life to exist is very small, and this is evidence someone wanted our universe to contain...
Hi, peeps! :)
I'm reading an interesting book about the 'mystery of existence' and I found an amusing quote which is worth sharing here with you. Perhaps it could start some discussion on this topic.
"Science may be able to trace how the current universe evolved from an earlier state of...
Apologist William Lane Craig argues the 2nd law of thermodynamics is evidence the universe had an absolute beginning. And whatever begins to exist has a cause. The universe began to exist. Therefore, the universe has a cause. This cause must be non-spatio-temporal and non-material since all that...