• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

1 Peter 1:17, vs John 5:22, who's correct?

Desert Snake

Veteran Member
1 Peter 1:17
The Abba presumably, at Judgement

John 5:22
Only Jesus, accorded judgement

Who is correct? They cannot both be correct, because even the trinity concept, these verses make a distinction. Unless there literally is no distinction, in the names, at all.

Are there two different Yeshuas, or Jesus's here, one claiming to be sole judge, or what?

Or is it something else?
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
1 Peter 1:17
The Abba presumably, at Judgement

John 5:22
Only Jesus, accorded judgement

Who is correct? They cannot both be correct, because even the trinity concept, these verses make a distinction. Unless there literally is no distinction, in the names, at all.

Are there two different Yeshuas, or Jesus's here, one claiming to be sole judge, or what?

Or is it something else?


the father, son, and spirit are one thing called by men with the noun god.


to be baptized in the name is to be immersed in all 3. they have one name, that name is at exodus 3:14.


jesus used the name as a son.


the 144000 have that name as the offspring of god.


Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

notice it says name singular and not names plural.
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
1 Peter 1:17
The Abba presumably, at Judgement

John 5:22
Only Jesus, accorded judgement

Who is correct? They cannot both be correct, because even the trinity concept, these verses make a distinction. Unless there literally is no distinction, in the names, at all.

Are there two different Yeshuas, or Jesus's here, one claiming to be sole judge, or what?

Or is it something else?
Jesus is the Father. Trinity doctrine is wrong.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit,

notice it says name singular and not names plural.

It simply means "with their authority", not literal names.

As in, "Stop in the name of the law!"
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
It simply means "with their authority", not literal names.

As in, "Stop in the name of the law!"
reference to that name is all throughout the bible.

it's referenced in the 23rd psalm as the name.

that is what the gnostic thunder perfect mind is all about, the name.


Genesis 4:26
And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the Lord.


Genesis 12:8
And he removed from thence unto a mountain on the east of Bethel, and pitched his tent, having Bethel on the west, and Hai on the east: and there he builded an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord.


the name of the lord is hayah
 
Top